The tag implication #43632 frieza -> frieza_race has been rejected.

Reason: this should make sense

EDIT: The tag implication frieza -> frieza_race (forum #329653) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

We don't imply characters to species, see topic #32857.

siral_exan said:
We don't imply characters to species, see topic #32857.

But what about yoda's species?

If you can't name it after a character (whose specie has no mention in lore), what do you do then? The fanwiki states:
"The species have been referred to as the Frost Demons and Friezas colloquially. In Dragon Ball Fusions, they are considered part of the Alien race."

We do the same when we don't know a character's family member's name (x's father, x'mother, x's brother, etc), until we get an official name that is.

azero said:
But what about yoda's species?

If you can't name it after a character (whose specie has no mention in lore), what do you do then? The fanwiki states:
"The species have been referred to as the Frost Demons and Friezas colloquially. In Dragon Ball Fusions, they are considered part of the Alien race."

We do the same when we don't know a character's family member's name (x's father, x'mother, x's brother, etc), until we get an official name that is.

Uh, I mean "we don't have the character tag frieza, automagically add the species tag frieza_race". when an implication occurs, tag X will proceed to add tag Y whenever used. In this case, character tags don't imply species tags, frieza could be drawn as a dog instead of whatever their default species is.

siral_exan said:
Uh, I mean "we don't have the character tag frieza, automagically add the species tag frieza_race". when an implication occurs, tag X will proceed to add tag Y whenever used. In this case, character tags don't imply species tags, frieza could be drawn as a dog instead of whatever their default species is.

Oh frick, I had a brain fart, my bad. Yeah, you're right, I thought it was the other way around.