The tag alias #57020 male/male/female -> group has been rejected.
Reason: probable someone who don't know existing tags
EDIT: The tag alias male/male/female -> group (forum #331396) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #57020 male/male/female -> group has been rejected.
Reason: probable someone who don't know existing tags
EDIT: The tag alias male/male/female -> group (forum #331396) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
katehanami said:
The tag alias #57020 male/male/female -> group has been rejected.Reason: probable someone who don't know existing tags
I think this would be better aliased to bisexual as that appears to be what they were looking for instead of group.
Edit: I tried to submit this BUR, but the site isn’t allowing me to. I can’t find any pending requests using any of these tags, either, so I don’t know why it’s not working.
alias female/male/female -> bisexual alias female/male/male -> bisexual alias female/female/male -> bisexual alias male/female/male -> bisexual alias male/male/female -> bisexual alias male/female/female -> bisexualUpdated
scaliespe said:
I think this would be better aliased to bisexual as that appears to be what they were looking for instead of group.
I'm not sure. Bisexual is for when one sex is sexually interacting with a male and female. But these could be meaning two males interacting with a female (or two females interacting with a male) but not each other. At the very least, female/male/female and male/female/male don't imply bisexual activity, the others are arguable.
watsit said:
At the very least, female/male/female and male/female/male don't imply bisexual activity, the others are arguable.
Not even if the balls touch?
wat8548 said:
Not even if the balls touch?
that you be an implication, but the tag is so general that an alias would work better, at least in my opinion
The tag alias male/male/female -> group (forum #331396) has been rejected by @slyroon.