Topic: [APPROVED] Fire Emblem BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #2363 is active.

create implication fire_emblem_heroes (189) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_awakening (344) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_path_of_radiance (76) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_three_houses (161) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_mystery_of_the_emblem (83) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_path_of_radiance (76) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_the_binding_blade (89) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (92) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_echoes (13) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication fire_emblem_shadow_dragon (0) -> fire_emblem (1317)
create implication corrin_(fire_emblem) (153) -> fire_emblem_fates (479)

Reason: linking all games to the parent series, and characters to said games

fire emblem fates already has an implication request here: topic #24879
there is another request to implicate fire emblem to nintendo here: topic #10791

EDIT: The bulk update request #2363 (forum #333130) has been approved by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

achtungmaybe said:
the different games have completely different sets of characters so i’d say so

In cases like Legend of Zelda and Final Fantasy, while each game is its own world and canon, there are plenty of same-name characters. I'm not really sure where to take this one, if characters are always different, even in name.

furrin_gok said:
In cases like Legend of Zelda and Final Fantasy, while each game is its own world and canon, there are plenty of same-name characters. I'm not really sure where to take this one, if characters are always different, even in name.

the implications should still exist for convenience, no? shared characters or not the umbrella tag would still serve a purpose for those who want to use it

  • 1