living_suit should be kept separate from living_clothing, since suit (as in fursuit) would be a subset of clothing, and not all clothing is a suit.
It instead should be aliased to the living_fursuit tag
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
living_suit should be kept separate from living_clothing, since suit (as in fursuit) would be a subset of clothing, and not all clothing is a suit.
It instead should be aliased to the living_fursuit tag
The bulk update request #2488 is pending approval.
remove alias living_suit (0) -> living_clothing (2219)
Reason: See above, and I agree
Part 2
imply living_fursuit -> living_costume
imply living_costume -> living_clothing
imply living_suit -> living_clothing
I hope this looks good.
Edit: updated part 2 to mimic non-living implication structure.
Updated
Wouldn't living_fursuit (or living_bodysuit) be more appropriate? A suit is a type of clothing, and mixing that with fursuits and bodysuits seems problematic.
well some people use suit as a shorthand for fursuit, but suit is also a type of clothing as you said, so maybe fursuit should imply suit, which implies clothing?
cutefox123 said:
so maybe fursuit should imply suit, which implies clothing?
Fursuit implies costume, which implies clothing. But a suit and fursuit are distinct types of clothing, so their living_ counterpart tags shouldn't be aliased together.
FIxed, now it should match the non-living implication structure.