The tag alias #57606 collaborative_oral -> collaborative_fellatio has been rejected.

Reason: They're essentially the same. Only reason I'd see not to would be in the case of cunnilingus, but of the few posts tagged with that tag, I haven't seen any like that-

EDIT: The tag alias collaborative_oral -> collaborative_fellatio (forum #335238) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Collaborative rimming and cunnilingus are both other forms of collaborative oral. Might be better to implicate collaborative_oral from these, instead of aliasing it away.

watsit said:
Collaborative rimming and cunnilingus are both other forms of collaborative oral. Might be better to implicate collaborative_oral from these, instead of aliasing it away.

Huh. Didn't know that, my bad-

The bulk update request #2524 is pending approval.

create implication collaborative_rimming (74) -> collaborative_oral (88)
create implication collaborative_cunnilingus (82) -> collaborative_oral (88)
create implication collaborative_fellatio (5170) -> collaborative_oral (88)
remove implication collaborative_rimming (74) -> collaborative_sex (8207)
remove implication collaborative_cunnilingus (82) -> collaborative_sex (8207)
remove implication collaborative_fellatio (5170) -> collaborative_sex (8207)
create implication collaborative_oral (88) -> collaborative_sex (8207)

Reason: Different kinds of collaborative oral.

golder06 said:
Only reason I'd see not to would be in the case of cunnilingus, but of the few posts tagged with that tag, I haven't seen any like that-

Whether you've seen them or not, you thought for yourself of a strong reason not to.

Maybe also remove the collaborative_sex implications on the three and have it implied from collaborative_oral instead?

The tag alias collaborative_oral -> collaborative_fellatio (forum #335238) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.