The bulk update request #2947 is active.

create implication antler_removal (69) -> antlers (50123)
create implication antler_removal (69) -> horn_removal (102)
create implication horn_removal (102) -> horn (668825)
create alias antlers_removal (0) -> antler_removal (69)

Reason: Small BUR around horn and antler removal. Reasoning is since antlers imply horn, antler removal should imply horn removal as well.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2947 (forum #341050) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Wouldn’t it be better to use the singular, antler_removal? I don’t think it’s necessary that both antlers are removed in the image to qualify for the tag, plus it would be in line with horn_removal being singular, plus I think antlers_removal just sounds awkward.

scaliespe said:
Wouldn’t it be better to use the singular...

+1 for this

dubsthefox said:
+1 for this

Agreed, +1 from me as well. Other than the small plural issue I wholeheartedly agree with the BUR

yeah, generally when we have "verb"-type general tags the objects are in singular forms even when the tags they imply use plural, see: breast_grab, finger_lick, ect.

Updated the BUR to use the singular version instead of the plural version.

The bulk update request #2947 (forum #341050) has been approved by @bitWolfy.