The bulk update request #2992 has been rejected.

create implication black_breasts (1004) -> black_chest (277)
create implication blue_breasts (1097) -> blue_chest (201)
create implication brown_breasts (645) -> brown_chest (302)
create implication gold_breasts (0) -> gold_chest (2)
create implication green_breasts (533) -> green_chest (100)
create implication grey_breasts (926) -> grey_chest (335)
create implication orange_breasts (366) -> orange_chest (72)
create implication pink_breasts (756) -> pink_chest (83)
create implication purple_breasts (616) -> purple_chest (175)
create implication red_breasts (311) -> red_chest (111)
create implication tan_breasts (1638) -> tan_chest (991)
create alias teal_chest (3) -> green_chest (100)
create implication white_breasts (4388) -> white_chest (1347)
create implication yellow_breasts (817) -> yellow_chest (199)

Reason: If a female/gynomorph/herm's breasts are a particular color, then in all likelihood that should mean their chest is that color too, since the breasts typically take up most of their chest

EDIT: The bulk update request #2992 (forum #341505) has been rejected by @TrevorTheYeen.

Unless someone paints their breasts.
post #1502840
Although I suppose, since breasts are usually part of the chest on anthropomorphic characters, this would just mean that multiple chest color tags would apply as well. :\

Another consideration is about multi-breasted anthros in which there are other breasts set below the ones on the chest, an anthropomorphosization of the real life animal's multiple mammary glands instead of the human model. These aren't teats or crotch_breasts. They aren't on the chest, are proper breasts, and can easily be a different color from those on the chest with or without paint or other third party coloring.

Since teal_breasts should be aliased to green_breasts, as meantion in topic #34819, the implication for teal_breasts here won't be valid (a tag can't be aliased away and implicate another tag at the same time). Also, teal_chest should be aliased green_chest for consistency.

EDIT:
And yeah, what Clawstripe said. There can be breasts on the stomach (below the chest, but above the crotch), meaning the color of those breasts won't necessarily match the color of the character's chest.

clawstripe said:
Unless someone paints their breasts.
post #1502840
Although I suppose, since breasts are usually part of the chest on anthropomorphic characters, this would just mean that multiple chest color tags would apply as well. :\

Another consideration is about multi-breasted anthros in which there are other breasts set below the ones on the chest, an anthropomorphosization of the real life animal's multiple mammary glands instead of the human model. These aren't teats or crotch_breasts. They aren't on the chest, are proper breasts, and can easily be a different color from those on the chest with or without paint or other third party coloring.

As for the first example, I think that would easily be solved with bodypaint & painted_breasts (along with painted_balls ofc for the other fella), since the presence of paint means the breasts and chest color is mostly obscured by said paint, and the paint color should be what is tagged, such as multicolored_paint or some such tag; at least in my opinion.

As for the second concern, that's true, I forgot about multi_breasts... that would definitely make these implications incorrect

I guess I should reject this BUR, yeah?

The bulk update request #2992 (forum #341505) has been rejected by @TrevorTheYeen.