Topic: [APPROVED] Gigantamax BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #3058 is active.

remove implication gigantamax_pokémon (0) -> pokémon (0)
create implication gigantamax_pokémon (0) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_alcremie (13) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_blastoise (3) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_butterfree (7) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_centiskorch (7) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_charizard (126) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_cinderace (169) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_coalossal (2) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_corviknight (4) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_drednaw (2) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_duraludon (5) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_eevee (50) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_gengar (1) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_grimmsnarl (4) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_hatterene (9) -> pokémon_(species) (0)

Reason: Getting rid of redundant implications

EDIT: The bulk update request #3058 (forum #342304) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #3059 is active.

remove implication gigantamax_inteleon (22) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_lapras (12) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_machamp (18) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_meowth (19) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_pikachu (22) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_sandaconda (1) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_snorlax (8) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_toxtricity (9) -> pokémon_(species) (0)
remove implication gigantamax_venusaur (10) -> pokémon_(species) (0)

Reason: Getting rid of redundant implications

EDIT: The bulk update request #3059 (forum #342305) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

Yeah those two forms don't actually exist in the games. In the TCG Gardevoir has a VMAX card, whatever that means, but I don't think it's relevant here.

  • 1