The bulk update request #3199 is pending approval.

create implication anatomically_correct_pussy (12304) -> animal_pussy (48888)
create implication anatomically_correct_penis (10355) -> animal_penis (326802)
create implication anatomically_correct_genitalia (23944) -> animal_genitalia (471034)
create implication claspers (237) -> animal_penis (326802)
create implication lagomorph_pussy (65) -> animal_pussy (48888)

The first sentence of the anatomically_correct_genitalia wiki page states that it applies to "A character with animal genitalia that matches the character's species." Also, since anatomically_correct_pussy/penis isn't supposed to apply to humans (i.e. non-animals) anyway, then anatomically_correct_pussy/penis should implicate animal_pussy/penis respectively. There's probably more stuff that could be done in a similar vein with tagging animal_pussy and animal_penis, but these are the most obvious and impactful ones.

Edit: Also added claspers -> animal_penis, and lagomorph_pussy -> animal_pussy implications as they seemed to be outliers that got missed.

Edit 2: Reworded for clarity.

Not entirely sure about this, but what if a fictional species, say a alien, that is not a animal, has anatomically correct penis?

chaser said:
Not entirely sure about this, but what if a fictional species, say a alien, that is not a animal, has anatomically correct penis?

Fictional species shouldn't be tagged anatomically correct. Not even pokemon should be.

anatomically_correct wiki says:

Not anatomically correct:

...

• The majority of alien, monster, demon, pokémon, hippogriff, gryphon, draconequus, dragon, and other hybrid or bizarre (non-real) species.
• It can't be anatomically_correct if you cannot define which genitalia is even supposed to be correct in the first place.

chaser said:
Not entirely sure about this, but what if a fictional species, say a alien, that is not a animal, has anatomically correct penis?

A quick search of 'alien anatomically_correct_genitalia solo' yields just a few results that should all be tagged with either animal_pussy or animal_penis anyways. Also alien_penis is already aliased to penis, and alien_pussy while not aliased to pussy probably should be, implying that there shouldn't be a special category for alien genitals anyways.

watsit said:
Fictional species shouldn't be tagged anatomically correct. Not even pokemon should be.

I assume this also includes stuff that has official NSFW/R-18 because still fictional and... yes, canons change. Not seen it with porn, but definitely in the comic book industry, where lawsuits happen and so on.

Having given this some more thought and browsed some wiki pages I think these additions to the BUR would also make sense:

imply anatomically_correct_genitalia -> animal_genitalia
imply claspers -> animal_penis
imply lagomorph_pussy -> animal_pussy

Unless anyone has objections I'll update the BUR with these.

Edit: Changed implication for claspers from genitalia to penis.

Bump, I've updated my original post for clarity but put simply anatomically_correct_genitalia should imply animal_genitalia since anatomically_correct_genitalia is only supposed to apply to characters with animal genitalia in the first place.