Topic: Macrophilia = Extreme Size Difference?

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #3248 is pending approval.

create implication gentle_giant (868) -> extreme_size_difference (14926)
create implication micro_on_macro (20) -> extreme_size_difference (14926)

Reason: Linked to https://e621.net/forum_topics/35163

Trying to add as much posts as possible that apply under extreme_size_difference. micro_on_macro and gentle_giant seem like the only certainties so far to add an implication to. Micro and macro can't be done separately due to solo images. size_play has a LOT of macro/micro images (i'd say the majority of that tag is) but seems to have been written under the assumption that it applies mainly to regular size_difference, and those pics are still under that tag so I don't wanna paint it with a wide brush.

Put in a new request implicating landscape_dwarfing to extreme_size_difference:

https://e621.net/forum_topics/35166

Sorry for the new thread, I'd rather add it to this one only but I don't know how to. Also if anyone has any suggestions for tags that are solely macrophilia that would help out.

there's already some discussion on with BUR #2533 and it seems like the consensus is more or less that macro_on_micro should just be aliased away

showmebruv said:
Sorry for the new thread, I'd rather add it to this one only but I don't know how to.

If you use a BUR (and you can do a single plain, vanilla alias or implication request with one), in the box near the bottom that says, "Forum Topic", you can put in the thread number for the topic you'd like to append the BUR to, in this case, 35164.

  • 1