The bulk update request #3462 is pending approval.

Reason: Looking up/down at X should imply both looking up/down and the other respective tag. The last four are aliases since they seem unnecessary.

pikarobo said:
The bulk update request #3462 is pending approval.

create implication looking_up_at_viewer (905) -> looking_up (38639)
create implication looking_up_at_viewer (905) -> looking_at_viewer (915944)
create implication looking_up_at_partner (1650) -> looking_up (38639)
create implication looking_up_at_partner (1650) -> looking_at_partner (34245)
create implication looking_up_at_another (883) -> looking_up (38639)
create implication looking_up_at_another (883) -> looking_at_another (153464)
create implication looking_down_at_viewer (4665) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_partner (2480) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_partner (2480) -> looking_at_partner (34245)
create implication looking_down_at_another (1563) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_another (1563) -> looking_at_another (153464)
create implication looking_down_at_self (1000) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_self (1000) -> looking_at_self (5750)
create implication looking_down_at_penis (440) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_penis (440) -> looking_at_penis (17596)
create implication looking_down_at_stomach (130) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_stomach (130) -> looking_at_stomach (30)
create implication looking_down_at_genitalia (100) -> looking_down (72892)
create implication looking_down_at_genitalia (100) -> looking_at_genitalia (19736)
change category eyes_looking_up (17) -> invalid
create alias looking_down_at_another's_penis (5) -> looking_at_another's_penis (255)
create alias looking_down_at_another's_stomach (1) -> looking_at_another's_stomach (3)
create alias looking_down_at_own_penis (0) -> looking_at_own_penis (1005)

Reason: Looking up/down at X should imply both looking up/down and the other respective tag. The last four are aliases since they seem unnecessary.

I like this, though I would suggest eyes_looking_up should be moved to the invalid category rather than aliased to looking_up.

Looking at posts that are tagged eyes_looking_up, a majority (five of eight) depict eye_roll. Four of these five images/animations (i.e., post #2567955, post #2567956, post #3510390, and post #3364610) show a character whose eyes are rolled up in pleasure rather than a character who is looking up. The remaining image (post #2513526) depicts a character facing forward, whose eyes alone are rolled away. None of these five posts seem to show the character who is "looking" up, so much as a character whose eyes have rolled up.

monroethelizard said:
I like this, though I would suggest eyes_looking_up should be moved to the invalid category rather than aliased to looking_up.

Looking at posts that are tagged eyes_looking_up, a majority (five of eight) depict eye_roll. Four of these five images/animations (i.e., post #2567955, post #2567956, post #3510390, and post #3364610) show a character whose eyes are rolled up in pleasure rather than a character who is looking up. The remaining image (post #2513526) depicts a character facing forward, whose eyes alone are rolled away. None of these five posts seem to show the character who is "looking" up, so much as a character whose eyes have rolled up.

Seems fair, but I don't really know how to do that.

pikarobo said:
Seems fair, but I don't really know how to do that.

If you click the link to your BUR in the original post, there should be an option to edit. You can replace create alias eyes_looking_up -> looking_up with change category eyes_looking_up -> invalid.

monroethelizard said:
If you click the link to your BUR in the original post, there should be an option to edit. You can replace create alias eyes_looking_up -> looking_up with change category eyes_looking_up -> invalid.

It wouldn't let me with "change category", so I just did "change" instead.

you’d want to do just “category” rather than just “change” as that seems to be a synonym for mass update (changing every instance of the tag to the tag “invalid”)

cheshire3rd said:
you’d want to do just “category” rather than just “change” as that seems to be a synonym for mass update (changing every instance of the tag to the tag “invalid”)

Alright, did just that.

Following the fact that looking_back_at_partner is implied to looking_back_at_another rather than looking_back, I think it's best to imply looking_x_at_partner to looking_x_at_another, recursively covering looking_x.