The tag implication #47332 after_sex_cuddling -> cuddling has been rejected.

Reason: Seems obvious...

EDIT: The tag implication after_sex_cuddling -> cuddling (forum #348837) has been rejected by @alphamule.

Is there a reason for the tag that's not already handled by after_sex+cuddling?

watsit said:
Is there a reason for the tag that's not already handled by after_sex+cuddling?

Not even sure. It was used 19 times so far, so followed the crowd. Yeah, other possibility is to just replace it with those two and make an alias to cuddling or after_sex. That way no one tries to use it again?

alphamule said:
Yeah, other possibility is to just replace it with those two and make an alias to cuddling or after_sex. That way no one tries to use it again?

That's what I'd suggest. Probably cuddling would be a better target in case someone tries to use it without any obvious signs of being after sex.

watsit said:
That's what I'd suggest. Probably cuddling would be a better target in case someone tries to use it without any obvious signs of being after sex.

I'll get right on it, then.

The tag implication after_sex_cuddling -> cuddling (forum #348837) has been rejected by @alphamule.

The bulk update request #3477 is pending approval.

create alias after_sex_cuddling (0) -> cuddling (15501)

Reason: To prevent mistagging in future... Only one of the posts didn't qualify for after_sex. ALL of them qualified for cuddling.