The bulk update request #3488 has been rejected.

remove implication unown_(pokemon) (406) -> generation_2_pokemon (75383)
create implication unown_! (42) -> generation_3_pokemon (85129)
create implication unown_? (34) -> generation_3_pokemon (85129)

Reason: unown a to unown z were introduced in generation 2
unown ! and unown ? were introduced in generation 3

I couldn't create an implication for unown a to unown z to generation_2_pokemon due to unown_(pokémon) already having an implication to generation_2_pokemon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3488 (forum #349042) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3489 has been rejected.

remove implication basculin (38) -> generation_5_pokemon (64502)
create implication white-striped_basculin (3) -> generation_8_pokemon (35665)

Reason: red-striped_basculin and blue-striped_basculin were introduced in generation 5
white-striped_basculin was introduced in generation 8

I couldn't create an implication for red-striped_basculin and blue-striped_basculin to generation_5_pokemon due to basculin already having an implication to generation_5_pokemon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3489 (forum #349043) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3490 has been rejected.

remove implication zygarde (342) -> generation_6_pokemon (73636)
remove alias zygarde_50_forme (92) -> zygarde (342)
remove implication zygarde_cell (25) -> zygarde_core (75)
remove implication zygarde_core (75) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
remove implication zygarde_10_forme (161) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
remove implication zygarde_complete_forme (32) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
create implication zygarde_cell (25) -> generation_7_pokemon (50500)
create implication zygarde_core (75) -> generation_7_pokemon (50500)
create implication zygarde_10_forme (161) -> generation_7_pokemon (50500)
create implication zygarde_complete_forme (32) -> generation_7_pokemon (50500)
create implication zygarde_cell (25) -> zygarde (342)
create implication zygarde_core (75) -> zygarde (342)
create implication zygarde_10_forme (161) -> zygarde (342)
create implication zygarde_complete_forme (32) -> zygarde (342)

Reason: zygarde 50 forme was introduced in generation 6
zygarde cell, zygarde core, zygarde 10 forme and zygarde complete forme were introduced in generation 7

since zygarde already implies legendary_pokemon, zygarde cell, zygarde core, zygarde 10 forme and zygarde complete forme won't need to imply legendary_pokemon

I couldn't create an implication for zygarde 50 forme to generation_6_pokemon and zygarde due to zygarde already having an implication to generation_6_pokemon and zygarde 50 forme already being aliased to zygarde

EDIT: The bulk update request #3490 (forum #349044) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3491 has been rejected.

remove implication dusk_mane_necrozma (29) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
create implication dusk_mane_necrozma (29) -> necrozma (157)
remove implication dawn_wings_necrozma (33) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
create implication dawn_wings_necrozma (33) -> necrozma (157)
remove implication ultra_necrozma (88) -> legendary_pokemon (57798)
create implication ultra_necrozma (88) -> necrozma (157)

Reason: dusk mane necrozma, dawn wings necrozma and ultra necrozma are fused forms of necrozma

EDIT: The bulk update request #3491 (forum #349045) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3548 has been rejected.

create implication origin_forme_dialga (12) -> generation_8_pokemon (35665)
create implication origin_forme_palkia (13) -> generation_8_pokemon (35665)

Reason: origin forme dialga and origin forme palkia were introduced in generation 8

EDIT: The bulk update request #3548 (forum #349807) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3549 has been rejected.

create implication ice_rider_calyrex (3) -> calyrex (143)
create implication shadow_rider_calyrex (4) -> calyrex (143)

Reason: ice rider calyrex and shadow rider calyrex are "fused" forms of calyrex, the only changes to calyrex's design is the cape which is longer in its "fused" forms

EDIT: The bulk update request #3549 (forum #349808) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

joaobaiao777 said:
Reason: ice rider calyrex and shadow rider calyrex are "fused" forms of calyrex

Calyrex is it's own form, so should be kept separate from ice rider calyrex and shadow rider calyrex.

watsit said:
Calyrex is it's own form, so should be kept separate from ice rider calyrex and shadow rider calyrex.

Dubious: the original pokemon remains present, completely visually unmodified, in these "forms". It is simply one riding the other.

votp said:
Dubious: the original pokemon remains present, completely visually unmodified, in these "forms". It is simply one riding the other.

Should there even be a tag for it then, if it's just one pokemon riding another, completely unmodified? Perhaps it should be an alias.

The bulk update request #3488 (forum #349042) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3489 (forum #349043) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3490 (forum #349044) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3491 (forum #349045) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3548 (forum #349807) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3549 (forum #349808) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.