The bulk update request #3508 has been rejected.

remove alias fossil_pokemon (2513) -> fossil_pokémon (0)

Reason: the tag fossil_pokemon is aliased to fossil_pokémon instead of the other way arround

Edit: removed the baby_pokemon_(species) implication

EDIT: The bulk update request #3508 (forum #349307) has failed: Alias for fossil_pokemon not found

EDIT: The bulk update request #3508 (forum #349307) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3509 has been rejected.

create implication mikon (4) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication monja (8) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication beta_pichu (3) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication pii (2) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication gyopin (2) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication para_(pokémon_gold_beta) (0) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication hina-zu (2) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication ko-nya (21) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication puchikon (3) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication betobebii (2) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication pudi (3) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication bariri-na (1) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication erebebii (2) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)

Reason: Beta/Redesigned/Scrapped Baby Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3509 (forum #349308) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3510 has been rejected.

create implication pichu (2387) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication cleffa (107) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication igglybuff (111) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication togepi (194) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication tyrogue (112) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication smoochum (101) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication elekid (100) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication magby (69) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)

Reason: Generation II Baby Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3510 (forum #349309) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3511 has been rejected.

create implication azurill (147) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication wynaut (88) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)

Reason: Generation III Baby Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3511 (forum #349310) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3512 has been rejected.

create implication budew (89) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication monja (8) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication chingling (61) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication bonsly (43) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication mime_jr. (59) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication happiny (78) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication munchlax (117) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication riolu (5665) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)
create implication mantyke (54) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)

Reason: Generation IV Baby Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3512 (forum #349311) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3513 has been rejected.

create implication toxel (56) -> baby_pokemon_(species) (0)

Reason: Generation VIII Baby Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3513 (forum #349312) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

joaobaiao777 said:
i think baby_pokemon_(species) would cause less confusion

I think that will still cause the same consternation as "baby_pokemon" did. Not just confusion, but also artists and people disliking any "baby" tag associated with their art. As it only refers to a particular evolutionary stage of certain pokemon (irrespective of their actual age), and we don't otherwise tag particular evolutionary stages, I don't think that should be a tag.

The bulk update request #3509 (forum #349308) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3510 (forum #349309) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3511 (forum #349310) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3512 (forum #349311) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3513 (forum #349312) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3508 (forum #349307) has failed: Alias for fossil_pokemon not found

The bulk update request #3508 (forum #349307) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3731 has been rejected.

create implication mega_aerodactyl (18) -> fossil_pokemon (2513)

Reason: Mega Aerodactyl is the mega evolved form of Aerodactyl, which is a fossil Pokémon

EDIT: The bulk update request #3731 (forum #352773) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.

The bulk update request #3731 (forum #352773) has been rejected by @JoaoBaiao777.