The tag implication #47432 collaborative_sex -> group_sex has been rejected.

Reason: Collaborative sex is by definition sex with at least 3 participants, completely meeting the definition for group sex.

EDIT: The tag implication collaborative_sex -> group_sex (forum #350029) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Like literally who says "collaborative sex"

mrnotsosafeforwork said:
Like literally who says "collaborative sex"

there are over 6000 posts with the tag collaborative_sex

so, at least a few people

I agree with this implication, but it does create a bit of a hiccup with multi-head posts, which seem to be counted as multiple participants for collaborative sex, but not group sex. It'll be easier to handle them now before this implication goes through.

oozeenthusiast said:
I agree with this implication, but it does create a bit of a hiccup with multi-head posts, which seem to be counted as multiple participants for collaborative sex, but not group sex. It'll be easier to handle them now before this implication goes through.

This just comes to mind:
post #3141037

The tag implication collaborative_sex -> group_sex (forum #350029) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.