Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: kabeshiri -> through_wall

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

maskedstranger said:
Reason: Kabeshiri is literally the Japanese term for through_wall. It even says so on the wiki page.

Shouldn't this be an alias, then?

Just realized that, was about to explain it.
Since there’s a separation between kabeshiri and reverse_kabeshiri, I assume that someone out there only wants to see one of the halves.

maskedstranger said:
Just realized that, was about to explain it.
Since there’s a separation between kabeshiri and reverse_kabeshiri, I assume that someone out there only wants to see one of the halves.

What is that separation? I presume kabeshiri refers to the trope of someone's rear end sticking out of a wall for "use", whereas reverse kabeshiri refers to when it's their front end instead. But I can easily be wrong.

Wouldn't through_wall + (front|rear)_view be an adequate way to make the distinction, then?

(and just alias both kabeshiri tags to through_wall afterwards)

Checked the images - seems it’d work.

I’m fairly new to this - do I need to create a new post and hide this one, or could a moderator modify it?

maskedstranger said:
I’m fairly new to this - do I need to create a new post and hide this one, or could a moderator modify it?

Please don't hide a tag request thread. It doesn't reject anything, removes valuable commentary from view, and irritates admins and users alike, especially if a new request comes along doing anything with these tags.

If you'd like to redo this request, you can go to the implication's page and reject it yourself, then request a BUR, using 36145 at the bottom to attach it to this thread.

Can't find a way to attach this thread to their request.
Well, this was part of a larger topic (topic #36147) anyways. Might as well make a BUR and continue discussion there.

BUR's BUR #3585, and discussion's after the 2nd post of topic #36147. (I thought it'd make a new thread - I'm sorry!)
(Ended up changing my mind on aliasing kabeshiri, btw. It's explained there.)

  • 1