Topic: [APPROVED] Tag alias: arven_(pokémon) -> arven_(pokemon)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Watsit

Privileged

The bulk update request #3631 is active.

create implication arven_(pokemon) (25) -> pokemon (516055)
create alias grusha_(pokémon) (0) -> grusha_(pokemon) (37)
create implication grusha_(pokemon) (37) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication iono_(pokemon) (117) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication nemona_(pokemon) (98) -> pokemon (516055)

Reason: He should also imply Pokemon. Other characters should follow suit, though I don't know all the characters added by the latest games. Someone else may need to make a more complete list.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3631 (forum #351159) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

faucet

Member

watsit said:
Someone else may need to make a more complete list.

I've been avoiding making any BURs lately because JoaoBaiao777 has dozens of them already which aren't being accepted for some reason, despite duplicates being posted every few days and it's just too much effort checking for all the overlap in the probably 10+ BURs I want to make.

mass update grusha_(pokémon) -> grusha_(pokémon)

You've got the tag with the é twice here. I also think making an alias would be a better option to prevent anybody tagging with pokémon instead in the future.

Watsit

Privileged

faucet said:
You've got the tag with the é twice here. I also think making an alias would be a better option to prevent anybody tagging with pokémon instead in the future.

Just noticed and fixed that. Is an alias necessary, since I don't think people have an easy time tagging it with an é (that's the whole point behind the recent change, that most people can't easily type é). It would be something they have to go out of their way to do, which they no longer have to.

faucet

Member

watsit said:
Just noticed and fixed that. Is an alias necessary, since I don't think people have an easy time tagging it with an é (that's the whole point behind the recent change, that most people can't easily type é). It would be something they have to go out of their way to do, which they no longer have to.

You'd think it was unnecessary but the é tag has 14 usage compared to just 1. Tag completion has probably contributed a lot to that count, but somebody had to type it that way to begin with and it'll probably take quite a while for people to get out of the habit of typing é, especially for mobile users and European keyboard owners where it's pretty trivial to type é.

Actually, if I even try to type these tags on my phone it autocorrects them: grusha_(Pokémon) arven_(Pokémon) nemona_(Pokémon)

But... If we're definitely killing every tag that contains é maybe the replacement should be done in the code rather than making hundreds of aliases...

Watsit

Privileged

faucet said:
You'd think it was unnecessary but the é tag has 14 usage compared to just 1. Tag completion has probably contributed a lot to that count, but somebody had to type it that way to begin with and it'll probably take quite a while for people to get out of the habit of typing é, especially for mobile users and European keyboard owners where it's pretty trivial to type é.

Actually, if I even try to type these tags on my phone it autocorrects them: grusha_(Pokémon) arven_(Pokémon) nemona_(Pokémon)

Okay, I changed it to an alias.

faucet

Member

The bulk update request #3742 is active.

create alias penny_(pokémon) (0) -> penny_(pokemon) (121)
create implication penny_(pokemon) (121) -> pokemon (516055)
create alias mela_(pokémon) (0) -> mela_(pokemon) (10)
create implication mela_(pokemon) (10) -> pokemon (516055)
create alias jacq_(pokémon) (0) -> jacq_(pokemon) (3)
create implication jacq_(pokemon) (3) -> pokemon (516055)
create alias clavell_(pokémon) (0) -> clavell_(pokemon) (10)
create implication clavell_(pokemon) (10) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication geeta_(pokemon) (9) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication dendra_(pokemon) (20) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication saguaro_(pokemon) (3) -> pokemon (516055)
create implication hassel_(pokemon) (9) -> pokemon (516055)

Reason: Additional BUR complimentary to Watsit's BUR above

Sources:

EDIT: The bulk update request #3742 (forum #352892) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1