The bulk update request #3787 is pending approval.

create implication gold_bar (105) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_anklet (475) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_anklet (475) -> anklet (12213)
create implication gold_armband (176) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_armband (176) -> armband (15372)
create implication gold_crown (529) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_crown (529) -> crown (39255)
create implication crown (39255) -> headwear (223286)
create implication gold_tiara (352) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_tiara (352) -> tiara (7299)
create alias gold_accessory (171) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_tooth (2460) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_piercing (945) -> gold_jewelry (14461)

Reason: A gold_bar is a bar of gold, thus should imply gold_(metal).

A gold_anklet is an anklet made of gold, thus should imply anklet and is a form of gold_jewelry so should imply it as well.

Same goes for gold_armband.

A gold crown or tiara should imply the material they're made of and imply the object they are. Additionally, crown should imply headwear (and tiara already implies crown, so it would get its headwear implication through it)

Mixed opinion on the Discord about whether or not gold accessories should have a tag. Consensus was that nearly all gold accessories were some form of jewelry, and thus the tag was redundant. Some piercings are clearly jewelry, like fancy gold earrings with gemstones in them, but are all? What about nipple piercings, or navel piercings? Would the mere fact they're gold make them jewelry? For now it's got an implication in the BUR and gold_accessory is being aliased away but if needed those lines can be removed

Also, gold earrings weren't mentioned in this BUR because they're already covered in topic #29931

trevortheyeen said:
A gold crown or tiara should imply the material they're made of and imply the object they are.

What if they're made of another material, like cardboard or plastic, and just colored gold and aren't a gold metal?

watsit said:
What if they're made of another material, like cardboard or plastic, and just colored gold and aren't a gold metal?

Fair, I guess a Burger King crown or the like could be gold colored and not actually made of gold. But in that case they shouldn't be tagged gold_crown. The equivalent would be talking about those chocolates with the golden colored aluminum wrapper that are supposed to look like coins. They're not actually gold, so you wouldn't tag gold_coin (which implies gold_(metal) already), even though it's gold in color.

For example, this post:
post #2192506
The tags list crown and paper_crown, but not gold_crown because while it is gold/yellow in color, it isn't made of gold.

trevortheyeen said:
The bulk update request #3787 is pending approval.

create implication gold_bar (105) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_anklet (475) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_anklet (475) -> anklet (12213)
create implication gold_armband (176) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_armband (176) -> armband (15372)
create implication gold_crown (529) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_crown (529) -> crown (39255)
create implication crown (39255) -> headwear (223286)
create implication gold_tiara (352) -> gold_(metal) (27737)
create implication gold_tiara (352) -> tiara (7299)
create alias gold_accessory (171) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_tooth (2460) -> gold_jewelry (14461)
create implication gold_piercing (945) -> gold_jewelry (14461)

Reason: A gold_bar is a bar of gold, thus should imply gold_(metal).

A gold_anklet is an anklet made of gold, thus should imply anklet and is a form of gold_jewelry so should imply it as well.

Same goes for gold_armband.

A gold crown or tiara should imply the material they're made of and imply the object they are. Additionally, crown should imply headwear (and tiara already implies crown, so it would get its headwear implication through it)

Mixed opinion on the Discord about whether or not gold accessories should have a tag. Consensus was that nearly all gold accessories were some form of jewelry, and thus the tag was redundant. Some piercings are clearly jewelry, like fancy gold earrings with gemstones in them, but are all? What about nipple piercings, or navel piercings? Would the mere fact they're gold make them jewelry? For now it's got an implication in the BUR and gold_accessory is being aliased away but if needed those lines can be removed

Also, gold earrings weren't mentioned in this BUR because they're already covered in topic #29931

Isn't crown headgear and not headwear? headwear is specifically for articles of clothing that are worn on the head, and crown wouldn't count.