The tag implication #49107 partially_inside -> vore has been rejected.

Reason: partially_inside really seems to imply vore. It clearly seems to be when a character's body is partially inside another character's body as part of a vore action (I mean not something like a penis in a pussy).
I have just created the Wiki of partially_inside, which said by definition that partially_inside implies vore.

EDIT: The tag implication partially_inside -> vore (forum #354469) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Searching for "partially_inside -vore" give only 3 results, whereas ""partially_inside" give 3000 results.
Cases where partially_inside is here and not vore is cases where the use of "vore" is a bit ambiguous.

The wiki of partial_vore ( https://e621.net/wiki_pages/41325 ) confirms the use of partially_inside I assumed.
partially_inside is a replacement of partial_vore which, for what I can read : was not clear enough, has been misuse and so it has been emptied of its contents to be replaced.

If we agree that partially_inside must be vore, we should remove the tag from post #3690422 and post #3544745.
Does the last one, post #2490548 count as vore??? This is way outside my wheelhouse.

I think the tag should be renamed, as it's easy to confuse for a penetrating penis/dildo being partially inside, or for a character to be partially inside a building or room or other object that's not vore-related.

What if a character is being consumed by a good creature through their entire body, rather than being eaten through the mouth?

There could be a partially_absorbed tag, but if the character isn't being absorbed, then they are just "getting inside" the goo creature. I wouldn't consider that vore.

m3g4p0n1 said:
What if a character is being consumed by a good creature through their entire body, rather than being eaten through the mouth?

There could be a partially_absorbed tag, but if the character isn't being absorbed, then they are just "getting inside" the goo creature. I wouldn't consider that vore.

absorption_vore is considered as vore.
I wouldn't have made it vore but it's just like that.
It's too late to change it. So if you don't want to see absorption_vore add to your search " -absorption_vore ".

watsit said:
I think the tag should be renamed, as it's easy to confuse for a penetrating penis/dildo being partially inside, or for a character to be partially inside a building or room or other object that's not vore-related.

I think "prey_partially_inside" would be a good tag.
There is really too much content to move it manually. We need an alias, maybe a temporary one.

mikael_the_d said:
absorption_vore is considered as vore.
I wouldn't have made it vore but it's just like that.
It's too late to change it. So if you don't want to see absorption_vore add to your search " -absorption_vore ".

Fair enough, I often forget how felxible searching can be

mikael_the_d said:
I think "prey_partially_inside" would be a good tag.
There is really too much content to move it manually. We need an alias, maybe a temporary one.

I think that's a good tag suggestion btw

I will cancel this implication request if the content of partially_inside is moved to prey_partially_inside. https://e621.net/forum_topics/37564

The tag implication partially_inside -> vore (forum #354469) has been rejected by @slyroon.