The bulk update request #4098 has been rejected.

create implication face_mask (1749) -> mask (48511)
remove implication gas_mask (3850) -> mask (48511)
remove implication domino_mask (999) -> mask (48511)
remove implication balaclava (318) -> mask (48511)
remove implication gas_mask (3850) -> mask (48511)
remove implication sports_mask (1178) -> mask (48511)
remove implication skull_mask (2655) -> mask (48511)
remove implication gimp_mask (908) -> mask (48511)
remove implication oxygen_mask (404) -> mask (48511)
remove implication face_shield (131) -> mask (48511)
remove implication guy_fawkes_mask (13) -> mask (48511)
remove implication diving_mask (350) -> mask (48511)
remove implication surgical_mask (387) -> mask (48511)
remove implication sleep_mask (174) -> mask (48511)
remove implication fukumen (0) -> mask (48511)
remove implication gas_mask (3850) -> mask (48511)
remove implication animal_mask (2131) -> mask (48511)
remove implication masquerade_mask (150) -> mask (48511)
remove implication kabuki_mask (14) -> mask (48511)
remove implication fierce_deity_mask (8) -> mask (48511)
remove implication noh_mask (78) -> mask (48511)

Reason: Okay, sure, maybe not all masks are intended to be worn on the face: "They are usually worn on the face, although they may also be positioned for effect elsewhere on the wearer's body, so in parts of Australia giant totem masks cover the body, whilst Inuit women use finger masks during storytelling and dancing." (mask wiki page)

But all face masks are masks. All the types of masks currently implicated to mask that are worn on the face should imply face_mask instead.
Part 1

EDIT: The bulk update request #4098 (forum #357006) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.

The bulk update request #4099 has been rejected.

create implication gas_mask (3850) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication domino_mask (999) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication balaclava (318) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication gas_mask (3850) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication sports_mask (1178) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication skull_mask (2655) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication gimp_mask (908) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication oxygen_mask (404) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication face_shield (131) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication guy_fawkes_mask (13) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication diving_mask (350) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication surgical_mask (387) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication sleep_mask (174) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication fukumen (0) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication gas_mask (3850) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication animal_mask (2131) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication masquerade_mask (150) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication kabuki_mask (14) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication fierce_deity_mask (8) -> face_mask (1749)
create implication noh_mask (78) -> face_mask (1749)

Reason: part 2

EDIT: The bulk update request #4099 (forum #357007) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.

I'm still not fully convinced face_mask shouldn't just alias to mask tbh. But I guess mask can also sometimes mean a carving of a face. I only made this BUR instead of an alias request because of that quote from the mask wiki page.

cloudpie said:
I'm still not fully convinced face_mask shouldn't just alias to mask tbh.

i mean as oxymoronic as that name is, the word face mask is used to means a pretty specific type of mask, so i think it still warrents it's own unique tag

dripen_arn said:
i mean as oxymoronic as that name is, the word face mask is used to means a pretty specific type of mask, so i think it still warrents it's own unique tag

Are you thinking of this kind? Because the more specific tag for those seems to be surgical_mask, not just face_mask
post #3291728

cloudpie said:
Are you thinking of this kind? Because the more specific tag for those seems to be surgical_mask, not just face_mask

yeah, i think face_mask should be aliased to surgical_mask, unless we don't have a tag for the beauty masks or "decorative masks" that face_mask's wiki mentions; there are going to be people out there who are going to see surgical masks and try to tag it with face_mask or try searching for art featuring surgical masks with face_mask

if noone else agrees, then yeah i think it's better to just alias it with mask than to implicate every kind of mask with face_mask, again, that's just oxymoronic

dripen_arn said:
if noone else agrees, then yeah i think it's better to just alias it with mask than to implicate every kind of mask with face_mask, again, that's just oxymoronic

Actually fuck it, I agree with the face_mask -> mask alias, gonna reject this BUR

The bulk update request #4098 (forum #357006) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.

The bulk update request #4099 (forum #357007) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.