The tag implication #50373 nude_female -> nude has been approved.

Reason: I recently noticed these implications don't exist. Do i need to create a separate request for each one?

nude_female -> nude
nude_male -> nude
nude_gynomorph -> nude
nude_andromorph -> nude
nude_herm -> nude
nude_intersex -> nude

EDIT: The tag implication nude_female -> nude (forum #361120) has been approved by @spe.

Make a BUR for them. Just click on "Request BUR" on top, type in some title. Under the "Script" box, there's a little "Help" that will give you some templates you can choose to copy-paste from. Use that to alias/imply/whatever. Stick in your reasoning in the "Reason" field, and you can attach the BUR to this thread by putting 37849 in the "Forum topic" field, and submit.

Although, do we want to imply all these or alias them?

I'm going to suggest that the [clothedness]_[gender] tags be aliased to [clothedness] and [gender]. These compound tags are not scalable and e6 was not designed to handle them. See related topic #34712 and topic #37737.

The tag implication nude_female -> nude (forum #361120) has been approved by @spe.

The tag implication nude_female -> nude (forum #361120) has been approved by @spe.

topic #40839 for the rest of these implications