The tag implication #50376 foot_focus -> foot_fetish has been rejected.

Reason: It's hard to explain, but I think that whenever the focus is on the feet, it's because you want to have a "stimulus" with them, which would basically be a foot_fetish

EDIT: The tag implication foot_focus -> foot_fetish (forum #361171) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

manay said:
The tag implication #50376 foot_focus -> foot_fetish has been rejected.

Reason: It's hard to explain, but I think that whenever the focus is on the feet, it's because you want to have a "stimulus" with them, which would basically be a foot_fetish

-1

post #3854460 post #3957977
I would have agreed with the rationale for all posts that have have blush, seductive or looking_at_viewer due to context, but concerning the pictures above, that'd be wrong.

Not everything on e621 is sexual.

manay said:
The tag implication #50376 foot_focus -> foot_fetish has been rejected.

Reason: It's hard to explain, but I think that whenever the focus is on the feet, it's because you want to have a "stimulus" with them, which would basically be a foot_fetish

The *_focus tags are purely about visual prominence, there are even sexual images that could be considered "foot focus" that don't focus on the feet in a fetishistic sense, adding the implication would flood the tag with posts that merely show feet closer to the camera or in greater detail than usual.

Both of these have a "foot focus", neither of them involve any fetishistic attention to the feet, at least in my opinion.

post #3124735 post #3446639

The tag implication foot_focus -> foot_fetish (forum #361171) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.