The tag implication #50392 moushley_graham -> ashley_graham_(resident_evil) has been rejected.

Reason: Both of them are (mostly) the same character

EDIT: The tag implication moushley_graham -> ashley_graham_(resident_evil) (forum #361560) has been rejected by @furrypickle.

topic #37870

wat8548 said:
topic #37870

I read through it and I don't know the context

Are the tags not mutually exclusive?

there's a pending alias request for moushley -> ashley_graham. despite this, someone decided to start removing both of these tags and started adding moushley_graham instead. e6 does not create new character tags for internet fads, this is just ashley graham furrified into a mouse.

so, this implication request is unnecessary due to topic #37870, and there's currently an argument for whether we keep moushley or alias it away, though theoretically if this catches enough attention it could be made into a copyright tag, for a similar reason bowsette_meme sprung into existence.

thanks for breaking my BUR btw, until this gets rejected my bur now has blocking transitive relationships

The tag implication moushley_graham -> ashley_graham_(resident_evil) (forum #361560) has been rejected by @furrypickle.