The tag implication #50483 foot_fetish -> feet has been approved.
Reason: Foot fetishism is a sexual fetishism for the feet and their participation in suggestive, risque, and/or sexual perspectives/acts.
Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
Dec 1st: If your account has been hit in the most recent ban wave of compromised accounts please reach out to us at management[at]e621.net and we'll help you get your account back.
If you've already contacted us give us a moment to get to you, though if it takes longer than a day for us to get back to you do feel free to reach out again!
Dec 2nd: If you got got and suddenly aren't able to see any of our exquisite selection of sausage and taco posts double check that Safe Mode is disabled in your account settings (Account -> Settings -> Safe mode [right above the blacklist text box]).
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #50483 foot_fetish -> feet has been approved.
Reason: Foot fetishism is a sexual fetishism for the feet and their participation in suggestive, risque, and/or sexual perspectives/acts.
What if someone is just talking about a foot fetish.. although I'm not sure how many people would be tagging foot_fetish in that situation
baxter_semen said:
What if someone is just talking about a foot fetish.. although I'm not sure how many people would be tagging foot_fetish in that situation
I think that would be a "in-picture text contradicts what is visually happening" situation, so the text shouldn't be taken into account for tagging in this case.
baxter_semen said:
What if someone is just talking about a foot fetish.. although I'm not sure how many people would be tagging foot_fetish in that situation
contents of dialogue should only ever be taken into account for dialogue-based general tags (stuff like: good_girl, profanity, mommy_kink, etc.), visual-based general tags like this are always only tagged based on the contents of the image and dialogue is ignored.
darryus said:
contents of dialogue should only ever be taken into account for dialogue-based general tags (stuff like: good_girl, profanity, mommy_kink, etc.), visual-based general tags like this are always only tagged based on the contents of the image and dialogue is ignored.
Reading the wiki page for foot_fetish, it does kinda seem to suggest that this tag does take into account dialogue and it doesn't really explicitly state that feet have to be present in the post. This post:
would be mistagged if this implication went through so I think what needs to be decided is whether or not there need to be feet in a post for foot_fetish to apply, and if the answer is yes the wiki probably needs to be changed to more clearly reflect this.Suprised that it wasn't already implied.
You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.
Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.