The tag alias #61952 fingering_mouth -> finger_in_mouth has been rejected.

Reason: can't finger mouth without finger in mouth

EDIT: The tag alias fingering_mouth -> finger_in_mouth (forum #362452) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Hm, fingering_mouth isn't very used, but I think it can be an useful tag to differentiate between sexual and non-sexual context involving fingers inside the mouth.

Maybe an implication would be better instead?

pewdiecrustlesspie said:
Reason: can't finger mouth without finger in mouth

Think you meant an implication instead of an alias.
Regardless, there is already an existing tag called oral_fingering, so fingering_mouth should be aliased to that instead.

The tag alias fingering_mouth -> finger_in_mouth (forum #362452) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #4837 is active.

create alias fingering_mouth (0) -> oral_fingering (173)
create implication oral_fingering (173) -> fingering (48823)
create implication oral_fingering (173) -> finger_in_mouth (7991)
create implication oral_fingering (173) -> oral (296428)

Reason:

• fingering_mouth is the same thing as oral_fingering.
• Other fingering_X tags have been aliased to their x_fingering counterpart.

• Oral_fingering requires the presence of fingers inside the mouth.

Should oral_fingering imply oral too?

EDIT: The bulk update request #4837 (forum #365801) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

m3g4p0n1 said:
Should oral_fingering imply oral too?

I don't see why not. anal_fingering implies anal, and vaginal_fingering implies vaginal.

watsit said:
I don't see why not. anal_fingering implies anal, and vaginal_fingering implies vaginal.

Alright, implication added 👍

The bulk update request #4837 (forum #365801) has been approved by @gattonero2001.