The tag alias #61958 cub_dominating_cub -> dominant_young has been rejected.

Reason: If a cub is dominating a cub, then the cub is also the dominant

EDIT: The tag alias cub_dominating_cub -> cub_domination (forum #362535) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

cub_domination is ambiguous and should be aliased away. It can refer either to a cub being dominated (submissive_cub) or a cub doing the dominating (dominant_cub).

I'm also not sure it's worth having a cub-specific tag for this, since it's specifically only for young anthro or feral characters, rather than young-based tags which apply to young characters regardless of form (young_dominating_young, dominant_young, submissive_young).

watsit said:
cub_domination is ambiguous and should be aliased away. It can refer either to a cub being dominated (submissive_cub) or a cub doing the dominating (dominant_cub).

I'm also not sure it's worth having a cub-specific tag for this, since it's specifically only for anthro or feral characters, rather than young-based tags which apply regardless of form (young_dominating_young, dominant_young, submissive_young).

it's probably being tagged here since Inkbunny uses various cub domination-themed tags like cubdom. i'd also be one for aliasing it to young unless we also want to make tags for the other young implications, as well as name them better.

@watsit

But the cub_domination description is clear that it should be used when the cub is dominating:

> Posts featuring a cub character acting as the one dominating within a domination scenario.

specteon said:
@watsit

But the cub_domination description is clear that it should be used when the cub is dominating:

> Posts featuring a cub character acting as the one dominating within a domination scenario.

Not everyone reads the wiki. Other tags like female_domination, feral_domination, etc, have already been aliased to less ambiguous names, so cub_domination really should be too.

Regardless of any of the other problems with the cub_domination tag, it looks like you meant this to be an implication, rather than an alias?

Refer to topic #36680 & forum #353935.

wat8548 said:
Regardless of any of the other problems with the cub_domination tag, it looks like you meant this to be an implication, rather than an alias?

Yeah. I meant to be an implication, not an alias.

The tag alias cub_dominating_cub -> cub_domination (forum #362535) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.