Topic: married_couple-related tag implication

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4688 is pending approval.

create implication husband_and_husband (194) -> husband (1249)
create implication husband_and_husband (194) -> married_couple (6884)
create implication husband_and_wife (5533) -> husband (1249)
create implication husband_and_wife (5533) -> wife (1323)
create implication wife_and_wife (119) -> wife (1323)
create implication wife_and_wife (119) -> married_couple (6884)

Reason: It stands to reason that the relationship tags husband_and_wife, husband_and_husband, and wife_and_wife should imply the respective spouse tags of husband and/or wife.

Additionally, husband_and_husband and wife_and_wife need an implication to married_couple (as husband_and_wife already is implicated).

Watsit

Privileged

These should probably be made into lore tags since it's not always visibly obvious that two characters are married. Even if they're wearing wedding rings, there's nothing to say they're married to each other

  • 1