Topic: PkStones Extended Edition

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #4712 is pending approval.

create implication mega_stone (638) -> evolutionary_stone (873)
create implication holding_evolutionary_stone (5) -> evolutionary_stone (873)
create alias evolution_stone (2) -> evolutionary_stone (873)
create alias element_stone_(pokemon) (0) -> evolutionary_stone (873)
create alias elemental_stone_(pokemon) (0) -> evolutionary_stone (873)
create implication shiny_stone (0) -> evolutionary_stone (873)

Reason: Looked up *stone tags since some seem missing both implications and Wiki entries:
mega_stone
evolution_stone/evolutionary_stone
everstone
holding_evolutionary_stone

Exists already:
fire_stone
thunder_stone
water_stone
leaf_stone
moon_stone
sun_stone
dawn_stone

Note: Warp_stone and warpstone are a WH40K thing, and not related. Tomb_stone and tombstone are similarly unrelated. Fixed them both to use the more common spelling.
Note2: Yes, everstone tag is spelled correctly - it's the only one without a space in the name on purpose because this is how the games and guides do it.

https://www.serebii.net/itemdex/list/megastone.shtml No, I'm not even remotely suggesting we do all of those. Mega_stone is unique to a species, anyways. It's a horrible waste of time when most of those are going to have 0-2 posts they're on. Come back to this when there's a few thousand examples of Pokemon evolutionary stones.

https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Key_Stone Not sure if these should count, as they're more of an accessory for the trainer?

https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Evolution_stone Oh, apparently, they used to be called element_stones and elemental_stones, but I doubt there's even one example where someone tagged them with those names.
Apparently there isn't even one example with these tags:
shiny_stone
dusk_stone
ice_stone Wait, I was wrong. 3 examples of this one.

This should be everything, but can add more if I missed anything.

wat8548 said:
Surely, by definition, everstone should not imply evolutionary_stone?

It's literally the evolutionary un-stone, hehe. Yeah, I wasn't sure if it was better to go by subject classification as they all have some effect (including negation) on evolution, or not include everstone because it literally does not do the one thing (functional classification) they all do. Game mechanics-wise, they're all for the same purpose. Controlling evolution mechanic. I guess I can edit it out and just mention it in the Wiki as only being related?

https://e621.net/forum_topics/28895 I swear I searched. :(

implicate ice_stone -> evolutionary_stone # duplicate of implication #38639
implicate dusk_stone -> evolutionary_stone # duplicate of implication #38637
implicate everstone -> evolutionary_stone

Removed

Updated

  • 1