The bulk update request #4823 is pending approval.
create implication leaf_in_hair (124) -> hair (1770454)
Reason: Leaf in hair requires leaf and hair. Flower_in_hair and feather_in_hair imply hair_accessory, so this should too.
Updated
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #4823 is pending approval.
create implication leaf_in_hair (124) -> hair (1770454)
Reason: Leaf in hair requires leaf and hair. Flower_in_hair and feather_in_hair imply hair_accessory, so this should too.
Updated
What if the leaves were in the hair because the character was laying in a pile of leaves, would those still count as an accessory?
faucet said:
What if the leaves were in the hair because the character was laying in a pile of leaves, would those still count as an accessory?
Same could be said about flowers and feathers which are already implicated. I'm not sure tbh
cloudpie said:
The bulk update request #4823 is pending approval.create implication leaf_in_hair (124) -> hair (1770454)
Reason: Leaf in hair requires leaf and hair. Flower_in_hair and feather_in_hair imply hair_accessory, so this should too.
Having a flower or feather in your hair seems to be more intentional than having a leaf in your hair. I would recommend removing that from the BUR for now
snpthecat said:
Having a flower or feather in your hair seems to be more intentional than having a leaf in your hair. I would recommend removing that from the BUR for now
Done
Removed the leaf implication since that's already been done now