Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: the_deep -> the_boys

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

faucet

Member

There's also multiple movies, novels, and TV series named The Deep. Admittedly none of which seem particularly relevant to e621, but The Deep himself is a human character with limited relevance to begin with.

Even though it looks quite silly, it might be better to go with the_deep_(the_boys).

Wandering Spaniel

Janitor

The bulk update request #4998 is active.

mass update the_boys -> the_boys_(series)
mass update the_deep -> the_deep_(the_boys)
create implication the_deep_(the_boys) (7) -> the_boys_(series) (50)
create implication soldier_boy_(the_boys) (6) -> the_boys_(series) (50)
mass update homelander -> homelander_(the_boys)
create implication homelander_(the_boys) (19) -> the_boys_(series) (50)
create implication starlight_(the_boys) (2) -> the_boys_(series) (50)
create implication crimson_countess_(the_boys) (5) -> the_boys_(series) (50)
create implication black_noir_(the_boys) (8) -> the_boys_(series) (50)

Reason: I really think it should have a suffix. There's a lotta boys on e621 :)
post #3684156 was already mistagged with the_boys before I fixed it. As far as I can tell it's unrelated to the series, although I've only seen part of the show so maybe I'm wrong.

These characters all have real full names too, but they're primarily known by their supe names, so I think those make sense for the tags. Their real names can be aliased to the supe names if those ever start getting tagged.

EDIT: The bulk update request #4998 (forum #367595) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

gattonero2001

Janitor

cloudpie said:
Reason: I really think it should have a suffix. There's a lotta boys on e621 :)

I agree, but please remember to add category changes for the updated tags...

  • 1