The bulk update request #5020 is pending approval.

Reason: Establishing more implications for existing flags with variants. rainbow_pride_colors and lesbian_pride_colors are already covered in topic #37242, so this'll cover a few for polyam, trans, and straight_ally's connections
Edit: Added a progress flag variant, and set up hetero_pride_colors grouping

Voted "meh" mainly because of
"create implication straight_ally_colors (8) -> straight_pride_colors (13)"

I believe the intent of both those tags is drastically different:
1) straight_ally_colors is about straights indicating they are allies-of-lgbt
2) straight pride flags have a history of ... um ... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_flag#Straight_pride (basically an anti-LGBT history ... ie NOT allies)

tabbyseraph said:
The bulk update request #5020 is pending approval.

create implication t4t_pride_colors (2) -> transgender_pride_colors (2078)
create implication alternate_transgender_pride_colors (26) -> transgender_pride_colors (2078)
create implication 1995_polyamory_pride_colors (25) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication 2016_polyamory_pride_colors (1) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication 2019_polyamory_pride_colors (5) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication 2020_polyamory_pride_colors (2) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication 2022_polyamory_pride_colors (13) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication alternate_polyamory_pride_colors (11) -> polyamory_pride_colors (59)
create implication straight_ally_colors (22) -> rainbow_pride_colors (3670)
create implication straight_ally_colors (22) -> hetero_pride_colors (33)
create implication straight_pride_colors (11) -> hetero_pride_colors (33)
create implication intersex-inclusive_progress_pride_colors (26) -> progress_pride_colors (264)

...

I agree with listerthesquirrel 's comment.

Also, if straight_ally_colors is going to imply rainbow_pride_colors, I feel that progress_pride_colors ought to as well. The progress pride flag includes the same sort of rainbow scheme as the straight ally flag.

listerthesquirrel said:
Voted "meh" mainly because of
"create implication straight_ally_colors (8) -> straight_pride_colors (13)"

I believe the intent of both those tags is drastically different:
1) straight_ally_colors is about straights indicating they are allies-of-lgbt
2) straight pride flags have a history of ... um ... see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_flag#Straight_pride (basically an anti-LGBT history ... ie NOT allies)

Thing is that the flags are of the same type, even if the straight flag in isolation tends to get used in a more hostile manner (though on occasion it does infact get used by people who're simply representing that they're also straight in some manner alongside being LGBT+ in some manner). It groups the straight flags together in a way that allows finding straightness being represented if wished, while also being capable of sorting out allyship if one really wants pure straight

monroethelizard said:
I agree with listerthesquirrel 's comment.

Also, if straight_ally_colors is going to imply rainbow_pride_colors, I feel that progress_pride_colors ought to as well. The progress pride flag includes the same sort of rainbow scheme as the straight ally flag.

Take a look at topic #37242, rainbow_pride_colors does group all the different sorts, it's just that a lot of the pride_colors tags are missing their implications in general

tabbyseraph said:
... It groups the straight flags together in a way that allows finding straightness being represented if wished, while also being capable of sorting out allyship if one really wants pure straight

Maybe imply both to straight_colors or heterosexual_colors ???

listerthesquirrel said:
Maybe imply both to straight_colors or heterosexual_colors ???

Fair; I've set up hetero_pride_colors