Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: foot_on_own_penis -> autofootjob

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Watsit

Privileged

Should this be an alias? If foot_on_own_penis is always an autofootjob, and an autofootjob is always foot_on_own_penis, it seems like an alias would be appropriate.

Though I'm not really sure foot_on_own_penis is always an autofootjob. As hard as it may be to tell from the lack of animation, a picture of a character's foot touching their own penis doesn't necessarily mean the penis is being stimulated. Depends if that corner case is significant enough to worry about.

watsit said:
Though I'm not really sure foot_on_own_penis is always an autofootjob. As hard as it may be to tell from the lack of animation, a picture of a character's foot touching their own penis doesn't necessarily mean the penis is being stimulated. Depends if that corner case is significant enough to worry about.

I agree with this, stimulation is required for an autofootjob but just having your foot on your own penis does not imply stimulation.

An implication might be acceptable, but not in this direction.

EDIT: It can't go the other way around either, because autofootjob isn't only for penises. See vaginal_autofootjob.

watsit said:
That's interesting. That tag has implications and aliases, but no uses. And there's no penile_autofootjob to distinguish one from the other.

I imagine it was created at the same time as vaginal_footjob, which does actually have uses. Interestingly there's no penile_footjob tag either, which there probably should be in that case... despite the fact it's going to be an overwhelming majority of the posts.

Watsit

Privileged

faucet said:
I imagine it was created at the same time as vaginal_footjob, which does actually have uses. Interestingly there's no penile_footjob tag either, which there probably should be in that case... despite the fact it's going to be an overwhelming majority of the posts.

In the same vein as handjob, which is specifically for the penis only. Making footjob be for the penis or vagina seems inconsistent, and the lack of penile_[auto]footjob makes the vaginal_ variants suspect. Perhaps they should be renamed, and leave [auto]footjob for the penis only to be consistent.

  • 1