The tag implication #51348 unseen_penetration -> obscured_penetration has been rejected.

Reason: They're the same.

EDIT: The tag implication unseen_penetration -> obscured_penetration (forum #369650) has been rejected by @slyroon.

If they're the same then what you want is an alias, not an implication

The bulk update request #5158 has been rejected.

create alias unseen_penetration (0) -> obscured_penetration (3837)

Reason: Same reason mentioned above.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5158 (forum #369696) has been rejected by @Zenith-Pendragon.

Unseen_penetration has also never been used before... this seems unnecessary sorry. I hadn't checked before making my previous comment.

The bulk update request #5158 (forum #369696) has been rejected by @Zenith-Pendragon.

The tag implication unseen_penetration -> obscured_penetration (forum #369650) has been rejected by @slyroon.