The tag implication #51360 young_penetrated -> loli has been rejected.

Reason: Would be the same as cub penetrated

EDIT: The tag implication loli_penetrated -> loli (forum #369946) has been approved by @slyroon.

I think all of these should be aliased to young_penetrated

The tag implication loli_penetrated -> loli (forum #369946) has been approved by @slyroon.

wait, what?

this is an improper hybrid tag. generally only gender, form, and age (and sometimes the age/size_difference tags) are considered for having the <noun>_<verb> treatment. loli is none of those.

sipothac said:
wait, what?

this is an improper hybrid tag. generally only gender, form, and age (and sometimes the age/size_difference tags) are considered for having the <noun>_<verb> treatment. loli is none of those.

In addition, aren't we planning to get rid of loli and shota and replace them with young_[gender]?

snpthecat said:
In addition, aren't we planning to get rid of loli and shota and replace them with young_[gender]?

maybe?

I think the having a tag the differentiate sexualized depictions would still be theoretically useful, if they were tagged more consistently. also extend them to be able to be applied to young intersex characters.
_{although we still wouldn't have a tag for the case with ambiguous_gender/null characters. so, even if shota and loli were applied to all applicable posts there'd still be those posts potentially falling through the cracks... hmm... nulli?}

sipothac said:
maybe?

I think the having a tag the differentiate sexualized depictions would still be theoretically useful, if they were tagged more consistently. also extend them to be able to be applied to young intersex characters.
_{although we still wouldn't have a tag for the case with ambiguous_gender/null characters. so, even if shota and loli were applied to all applicable posts there'd still be those posts potentially falling through the cracks... hmm... nulli?}

It would be much better to have a unified tag for that in that case anyway, loli/shota need to be done away with.

sipothac said:
maybe?

I think the having a tag the differentiate sexualized depictions would still be theoretically useful, if they were tagged more consistently. also extend them to be able to be applied to young intersex characters.
_{although we still wouldn't have a tag for the case with ambiguous_gender/null characters. so, even if shota and loli were applied to all applicable posts there'd still be those posts potentially falling through the cracks... hmm... nulli?}

We could have an umbrella tag that encompasses all the genders, something like sexualised_young or young_explicit and alias loli and shota to it.