The bulk update request #5205 is active.

create alias wandering_nipple (11) -> nipples (1277986)
create alias wandering_boob (4) -> breasts (1746558)

Reason: More tags for anatomical errors. Tags like this are insulting to artists, like bad_anatomy which was invalidated.
Interestingly wandering_nipple in particular currently contains a lot of images that simply have nipples pointing a bit sideways, which is actually very normal for a lot of real people. See east-west here.

EDIT: The bulk update request #5205 (forum #370499) has been approved by @slyroon.

cloudpie said:
The bulk update request #5205 is active.

create alias wandering_nipple (11) -> nipples (1277986)
create alias wandering_boob (4) -> breasts (1746558)

Reason: More tags for anatomical errors. Tags like this are insulting to artists, like bad_anatomy which was invalidated.
Interestingly wandering_nipple in particular currently contains a lot of images that simply have nipples pointing a bit sideways, which is actually very normal for a lot of real people. See east-west here.

post #2987617 LOL@this example
Hmm, what about when it's intentional like that?
Cursory glance seems to show that for most of them, the tag is inapplicable, even if valid. This one should probably have a different tag. Is there a tag for nipples/whatever in really, really weird locations? Like on say, an arm or back or head. XD Flowers oddly enough are analogous to reproductive organs AND certain glands like those used to make milk?

Unusual nipple placement might apply to that? Rarest damn fetish. Unusual nipples doesn't apply as they're not say, vine-nipples or the infamous (at least@E-H IRC channel) dicknipples. Another non-baiting (at least of the artist) tag: unusual_breast_placement

post #1307955 Ouch, that looks like torsion!

alphamule said:
Unusual nipple placement might apply to that? Rarest damn fetish. Unusual nipples doesn't apply as they're not say, vine-nipples or the infamous (at least@E-H IRC channel) dicknipples. Another non-baiting (at least of the artist) tag: unusual_breast_placement

Unusual_*_placement sounds perfect to me!
I kinda don't think these wandering tags should be aliased to unusual placement though, just the applicable posts like the bulbasaur manually moved... but I'm not positive. What do you think?

The bulk update request #5210 is active.

Reason: Mirroring the unusual_genitalia_placement tag which already has implications

EDIT: The bulk update request #5210 (forum #370588) has been approved by @slyroon.

cloudpie said:
The bulk update request #5210 is active.

create implication unusual_nipple_placement (4) -> nipples (1277986)
create implication unusual_nipple_placement (4) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_anus_placement (13) -> anus (548425)
create implication unusual_anus_placement (13) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_balls_placement (6) -> balls (1064037)
create implication unusual_balls_placement (6) -> unusual_genitalia_placement (2919)
create implication unusual_sheath_placement (2) -> sheath (89979)
create implication unusual_sheath_placement (2) -> unusual_genitalia_placement (2919)
create implication unusual_breast_placement (18) -> breasts (1746558)
create implication unusual_breast_placement (18) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_eye_placement (170) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_tooth_placement (0) -> teeth (715140)
create implication unusual_tooth_placement (0) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_mouth_placement (88) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)
create implication unusual_clitoris_placement (1) -> clitoris (120772)
create implication unusual_clitoris_placement (1) -> unusual_genitalia_placement (2919)
create implication unusual_tail_placement (5) -> tail (1382023)
create implication unusual_tail_placement (5) -> unusual_anatomy (21006)

Reason: Mirroring the unusual_genitalia_placement tag which already has implications

I was really, really tired. I was running in circles trying to focus on that 6-part BUR and this also slipped my mind to check. Thanks for remembering to check the implication tree! Those are small-presence tags that can't generally be replaced with more general tags. Unlike a lot of the ones in the other topic. :whistles:

I see you got both the obvious anatomy implications like "unusual_anatomy" and *organ/limb*, but a question: Wouldn't you normally implicate unusual_genitals as well?

alphamule said:
I see you got both the obvious anatomy implications like "unusual_anatomy" and *organ/limb*, but a question: Wouldn't you normally implicate unusual_genitals as well?

alphamule said:
Unusual nipples doesn't apply as they're not say, vine-nipples or the infamous (at least@E-H IRC channel) dicknipples.

;)

Bump

Should balls_above_penis imply unusual_balls_placement? That setup is normal for marsupials, but unusual in general

Yeah it should.

cloudpie said:
Bump

Should balls_above_penis imply unusual_balls_placement? That setup is normal for marsupials, but unusual in general

Totally.

A tag for more extreme (and likely intentional) examples would be fun to have around, but yeah these tags need to go. Some of these aren't even that bad anatomically, just incorrect physics.

Added balls_above_penis -> unusual_ball_placement

cloudpie said:
Added balls_above_penis -> unusual_ball_placement

I feel like this should be a separate vote, there's not really any precedent for attaching an unusual_* tag to an anatomical feature that, albeit uncommon, exists in real life.

sipothac said:
I feel like this should be a separate vote, there's not really any precedent for attaching an unusual_* tag to an anatomical feature that, albeit uncommon, exists in real life.

forked_tail implicates unusual_tail topic #30617

snpthecat said:
forked_tail implicates unusual_tail topic #30617

is that a thing on real animals (outside of mutations and result of injury)? the only specific species the wiki sites it being a feature on is espion, which, last I checked, is fictional.

balls_above_penis is a feature marsupials have in real life.

in my opinion implying it to unusual_ball_placement would be like impling pseudo-penis to unusual_clitoris just because it's only a feature of hyenas.

sipothac said:
is that a thing on real animals (outside of mutations and result of injury)? the only specific species the wiki sites it being a feature on is espion, which, last I checked, is fictional.

balls_above_penis is a feature marsupials have in real life.

in my opinion implying it to unusual_ball_placement would be like impling pseudo-penis to unusual_clitoris just because it's only a feature of hyenas.

A number of birds have forked tails, an example of one is the Fork-tailed Flycatcher

The bulk update request #6534 has been rejected.

create implication balls_above_penis (711) -> unusual_balls_placement (6)

Reason: For separate voting, as requested

I don't have much of an opinion either way on this one, personally

EDIT: The bulk update request #6534 (forum #390691) has been rejected by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5205 (forum #370499) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #5210 (forum #370588) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6534 (forum #390691) has been rejected by @slyroon.

cloudpie said:
The bulk update request #6534 has been rejected.

create implication balls_above_penis (711) -> unusual_balls_placement (6)

Reason: For separate voting, as requested

I don't have much of an opinion either way on this one, personally

EDIT: The bulk update request #6534 (forum #390691) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Not gonna approve that one as almost every use of that tag is for marsupials, which is anatomically correct to have balls above their penis, so it's not "unusual" for them.