The tag alias #63536 microfluff -> fluffy_pony_(species) has been rejected.

Reason: Microfluffs are a tiny subspecies of fluffy ponies. As such, their presence implies members of the species.

EDIT: The tag alias microfluff -> fluffy_pony_(species) (forum #372602) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

peacethroughpower said:
The tag alias #63536 microfluff -> fluffy_pony_(species) has been rejected.

Reason: Microfluffs are a tiny subspecies of fluffy ponies. As such, their presence implies members of the species.

I would recommend that if you have two or more aliases/implications you want to do simultaneously, that you should use a bur

snpthecat said:
I would recommend that if you have two or more aliases/implications you want to do simultaneously, that you should use a bur

I'll bear that in mind for next time.

peacethroughpower said:
Microfluffs are a tiny subspecies of fluffy ponies. As such, their presence implies members of the species.

Was this instead supposed to be an implication, then?

faucet said:
Was this instead supposed to be an implication, then?

Yes. Derp.

The tag alias microfluff -> fluffy_pony_(species) (forum #372602) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8283 is active.

create implication microfluff (35) -> fluffy_pony_(species) (2389)
create implication seafluff (22) -> fluffy_pony_(species) (2389)

Reason: Doing it right

EDIT: The bulk update request #8283 (forum #406307) has been approved by @scaliespe.

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #8283 is active.

create implication microfluff (35) -> fluffy_pony_(species) (2389)
create implication seafluff (22) -> fluffy_pony_(species) (2389)

Reason: Doing it right

I still feel like I've seen "sea fluffy" used more often than "seafluff" but I was more of the booru era, so terminology might have changed since then

The bulk update request #8283 (forum #406307) has been approved by @scaliespe.