Topic: Secret stones BUR (TotK)

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #5397 is pending approval.

create alias secret_stone_of_wind (34) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_fire (0) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_water (2) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_lightning (4) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_light (7) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_time (18) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_darkness (5) -> secret_stone (171)
create alias secret_stone_of_spirit (94) -> secret_stone (171)
create implication secret_stone (171) -> the_legend_of_zelda (27923)

Reason: This is for the secret stones introduced in The Legend Of Zelda:Tears Of The Kingdom. They are teardrop-shaped stones that amplify the user's power, worn by the character that owns it (via a necklace, headpiece, etc.)

For most of the lines, all are secret stones with different properties and names. For the last line, secret stones originate from and have only appeared in Tears of the Kingdom.

(note: changed implications for each specific secret stone into aliases. )

Updated

I think we should alias all of the specific secret stones into secret stone. I can't anyone actually using the specific secret stone tags. They're clutter, especially considering that these aren't official names, and there is a theoretical infinite amount of new elements people could think of putting in a secret stone. This implication will give legitimacy to creating more secret_stone_of_* tags, which will only result in more dangling tags that never get more posts after their creator gets bored of them.

oozeenthusiast said:
I think we should alias all of the specific secret stones into secret stone. I can't anyone actually using the specific secret stone tags. They're clutter, especially considering that these aren't official names, and there is a theoretical infinite amount of new elements people could think of putting in a secret stone. This implication will give legitimacy to creating more secret_stone_of_* tags, which will only result in more dangling tags that never get more posts after their creator gets bored of them.

+1 to this, i thought it WAS gonna be an alias.

oozeenthusiast said:
I think we should alias all of the specific secret stones into secret stone. I can't anyone actually using the specific secret stone tags. They're clutter, especially considering that these aren't official names, and there is a theoretical infinite amount of new elements people could think of putting in a secret stone. This implication will give legitimacy to creating more secret_stone_of_* tags, which will only result in more dangling tags that never get more posts after their creator gets bored of them.

alright, changing it.

themasterpotato said:
Not 100% sure about the tears of the kingdom implication, that would get messy if Nintendo releases another game featuring secret stones

Perhaps it could be unimplicated later if that happens? or should I imply (the full form of) tloz instead?

Watsit

Privileged

alxyz_on said:
Perhaps it could be unimplicated later if that happens? or should I imply (the full form of) tloz instead?

Unimplications (BURs in general) can take a lot of time before they're approved, during which time an incorrect tag may be applied to posts that need it manually removed after the implication is deleted. So even if an implication would be accurate now, if there's a high risk of it becoming bad in the future it may be worth avoiding to be safe. Implicating the_legend_of_zelda instead should be fine.

watsit said:
Unimplications (BURs in general) can take a lot of time before they're approved, during which time an incorrect tag may be applied to posts that need it manually removed after the implication is deleted. So even if an implication would be accurate now, if there's a high risk of it becoming bad in the future it may be worth avoiding to be safe. Implicating the_legend_of_zelda instead should be fine.

alright

  • 1