The bulk update request #5431 is pending approval.

create alias one_sided_climax (492) -> one_sided_orgasm (0)
create implication one_sided_orgasm (0) -> orgasm (197045)

Reason: Self explanatory

This seems ripe for misuse. In quite a few, if not most, instances I'm finding, you can't see if the other character is having an orgasm or not
post #1825827 post #4219715 post #4084562
A literal interpretation of the wiki would have it apply to every male/female and male/ambiguous post with an orgasm.

My main goal with this tag is for it be used in animations, its often very obvious in animations who cums and who doesn't. It should not be used in non-animated content

watsit said:
A literal interpretation of the wiki would have it apply to every male/female and male/ambiguous post with an orgasm.

Added some notes to clear things up a bit, I hope it helps.

waller said:
My main goal with this tag is for it be used in animations, its often very obvious in animations who cums and who doesn't. It should not be used in non-animated content

I don't see why it should be restricted to animated content, as long as you see one character having/had an orgasm and the other clearly isn't/didn't (like post #4117856). Animated posts are just as susceptible to misinterpretation as non-animated, given my previous three examples (and many more) are incorrect. Unfortunately I don't think adding notes to the wiki will help much, when people use it based on the tag name and seeing other incorrect uses of the tag.