The bulk update request #5451 is pending approval.

remove implication two_tone_wool (11) -> multicolored_wool (20)
remove implication two_tone_wool (11) -> two_tone_fur (126667)

Reason: Want to replace two_tone_* tags because they confuse TONE with COLOR.
(starting with wool, because simpler than some other two_tone* tags)

two_tone_wool says:
"Used for posts depicting a character with wool that has two distinct colors."

But https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/tone
says tone is:
"... A tone is one of the lighter, darker, or brighter shades of the same colour. ..."

example: a creature with LIGHT GREEN wool and DARK GREEN wool has TWO_TONE_wool. (two tones of green)

Since old tag is two_tone_wool, (note: NO "d" after tone)
suggest new tag be two_color_wool (ie. to match style of two_tone_wool)

(EDIT: and maybe BUR above should also
remove alias two_color_body -> two_tone_body ,
so that BUR below can have
alias two_tone_body -> two_color_body)

***

part 2 of BUR (draft):
alias two_tone_wool -> two_color_wool
imply two_color_wool -> two_color_fur
imply two_color_wool -> multicolored_fur
imply two_color_fur -> two_color_body
imply two_color_body -> multicolored_body

***

Talk at https://e621.net/forum_topics/24546 has stalled. (old thread possibly overwhelming and/or TL;DR)
Starting this thread in hopes of getting ball rolling on replacing two_tone_* tags.

side note: one of the tags above, two_color_fur has 50 posts.

What do others think of adding
remove alias two_color_body -> two_tone_body
to part1 of this BUR???

So that part2 can include:
alias two_tone_body -> two_color_body
(OR just
update two_tone_body -> two_color_body )