Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
I know Snoot Game is a parody of Goodbye Vulcano High. But these two are still different media products.
GVH and SG have pretty contrary messages, as GVH deals with themes like identity in a very affirmative way, while SG mocks the LGBTQ+ Community and the game it's based on in a vile way.
I think these two should be seperated (currently Snoot Game is an alias of Goodbye Vulcano High) to allow users, to filter out Snoot Game content.
The tag snootgame aliases to goodbye_volcano_high, but we do have a separate tag snoot_game_(fan_game). I think the solution is to change the alias destination of snootgame to the latter.
The bulk update request #5548 is active.
remove alias snootgame (0) -> goodbye_volcano_high (8029)
remove alias snoot_game (8195) -> goodbye_volcano_high (8029)
Reason: Per discussion. Followed by alias snootgame -> snoot_game and alias snoot_game_(fan_game) -> snoot_game.
EDIT: The bulk update request #5548 (forum #376482) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
Also it might be nice if this could be expedited, since the current alias is rather distasteful for reasons already outlined. In fact, we should probably change it so that the tag is snoot_game without the "fan game" part, since it's decidedly not a fan game.
after the dealias get approved: should snoot_game then be implied to goodbye_volcano_high? or are there too many new characters exclusive to snootgame that they should be totally distinct and only tagged with both when characters from both are present? i'm honestly not familiar enough with either games to call it, just wanted to throw my 2-cents out there
Added a few things to the BUR. As I stated, since Snoot Game is not really a "fan game", it's a hatefic, and because it doesn't need any disambiguation, I decided to alias snoot_game_(fan_game) to snoot_game.
dripen_arn said:
after the dealias get approved: should snoot_game then be implied to goodbye_volcano_high? or are there too many new characters exclusive to snootgame that they should be totally distinct and only tagged with both when characters from both are present? i'm honestly not familiar enough with either games to call it, just wanted to throw my 2-cents out there
Personally I think there should be no implication. From what I've read, Snoot Game has original characters.
The bulk update request #5548 (forum #376482) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
The bulk update request #5551 is active.
create alias snootgame (0) -> snoot_game (8195)
create alias snoot_game_(fan_game) (0) -> snoot_game (8195)
Reason: Per discussion.
EDIT: The bulk update request #5551 (forum #376547) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
The bulk update request #5551 (forum #376547) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
The bulk update request #5560 is active.
create implication anon_(snoot_game) (2346) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication amber_(snoot_game) (414) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication erin_(snoot_game) (187) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication ripley_(snoot_game) (135) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication samantha_(snoot_game) (154) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication schizo_chan_(snoot_game) (264) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication cassandra_(snoot_game) (148) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication tusk_(snoot_game) (47) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication moe_(snoot_game) (40) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication sera_(snoot_game) (139) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication melissa_(snoot_game) (142) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication tony_(snoot_game) (47) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication heather_(snoot_game) (54) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication tommy_(snoot_game) (60) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication claire_(snoot_game) (31) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication riley_(snoot_game) (7) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication angel_(snoot_game) (23) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication tana_(snoot_game) (7) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication shannon_(snoot_game) (8) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication tiffany_(snoot_game) (17) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication taxi_driver_(snoot_game) (4) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication trish's_dad_(snoot_game) (3) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication mark_(snoot_game) (4) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication chadshark_(snoot_game) (14) -> snoot_game (8195)
create implication trish's_mom_(snoot_game) (6) -> snoot_game (8195)
Reason: May as well imply these while we're at it
I know nothing about either of these games, so someone more familiar with them may want to double-check these. I just grabbed the top 25 tags from *(snoot_game)
EDIT: The bulk update request #5560 (forum #376677) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
Updated by auto moderator
The bulk update request #5560 (forum #376677) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.
