The tag implication #52937 spooning -> cuddling has been rejected.

Reason: Wiki starts with "a form of cuddling..."

EDIT: The tag implication spooning -> cuddling (forum #382264) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.

Nevermind, I should've checked for the 47 fucking pages of mistagged spoon_position first

In theory this implication should apply, but it needs a HUGE cleanout first

cloudpie said:
Nevermind, I should've checked for the 47 fucking pages of mistagged spoon_position first

In theory this implication should apply, but it needs a HUGE cleanout first

What's the mistag in this case?

strikerman said:
What's the mistag in this case?

Spooning's wiki says it's a cuddling position, and the cuddling wiki says it doesn't apply when characters are having sex, that embrace should be used instead for that. I thought that was why spoon_position doesn't imply spooning

cloudpie said:
Spooning's wiki says it's a cuddling position, and the cuddling wiki says it doesn't apply when characters are having sex, that embrace should be used instead for that. I thought that was why spoon_position doesn't imply spooning

But spoon_position does imply spooning

strikerman said:
But spoon_position does imply spooning

...I may be stupid LOL

The tag implication spooning -> cuddling (forum #382264) has been rejected by @Cloudpie.

spooning should at least imply embrace though, if the spoon position implication is staying

The bulk update request #6046 has been rejected.

create implication spooning (3649) -> embrace (14)

Reason: spooning is either cuddling or embrace (spoon position), and cuddling is implied to embrace

EDIT: The bulk update request #6046 (forum #384268) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.

Got cuddling mixed up with hug, cuddling doesn't imply embrace

The bulk update request #6046 (forum #384268) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.

I feel like it would be better to keep spooning limited to non-sexual acts, no?

scaliespe said:
I feel like it would be better to keep spooning limited to non-sexual acts, no?

There is a direct implication from spoon position to spooning, so best get rid of that alias first

snpthecat said:
There is a direct implication from spoon position to spooning, so best get rid of that alias first

Yes, that’s my point. Any objections to getting rid of the implication?

scaliespe said:
Yes, that’s my point. Any objections to getting rid of the implication?

I don't have any, but others might

The bulk update request #6062 is active.

remove implication spoon_position (3438) -> spooning (3649)

Reason: Well, let’s try it, then.

should ideally be reserved for the form of cuddling so that it can imply that tag, rather than being polluted with sex acts from the spoon_position implication. People looking for spooning are most likely not looking for sex acts. The spoon_position tag already serves that purpose, so having it imply spooning isn’t helpful.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6062 (forum #384418) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6062 (forum #384418) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6366 is pending approval.

create implication spooning (3649) -> cuddling (15473)

Reason: With the above unimplication of spoon_position to spooning, spooning should imply cuddling

We should first clear out spooning from spoon_position though.

spooning spoon_position duo has 37 pages while spooning spoon_position has 40. I think it's safe to remove spooning from spooning spoon_position duo, and the rest can be checked manually.
spooning -spoon_position rating:e is also a sizeable issue

The bulk update request #7841 has been rejected.

create implication spoon_position (3438) -> embrace (14)

Reason: I don't think you can have a spoon position without an embrace

EDIT: The bulk update request #7841 (forum #402866) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.

The bulk update request #7841 (forum #402866) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.