The tag alias #65033 teasing_viewer -> teasing has been rejected.

Reason: Makes sense to me!

EDIT: The tag alias teasing_viewer -> teasing (forum #382536) has been rejected by @slyroon.

this should be an implication

pleaseletmein said:
this should be an implication

^Yes.

teasing_viewer is additionally predicate on dialogue ("Do not add if there's no dialogue." / "involving dialogue") - should it imply that as well? Not sure what the usual implication relationship is for "un-obvious" predicates.

(Could be that taggers add teasing_viewer without realizing it's to do with dialogue, so dialogue is added implicitly, and later someone else correctly removes teasing_viewer but misses removing dialogue. OTOH edit reverts / diffs handle that cleanly if taggers are checking a post's tag history alongside its tag list.)

It... should be an implication, you're right. I've been gone for a while and I mixed up alias and implication, hah.

The tag alias teasing_viewer -> teasing (forum #382536) has been rejected by @slyroon.