The tag implication #53135 ratchet_and_clank -> insomniac_games has been rejected.

Reason: Since Ratchet and Clank is (or as of Rift Apart) developed by the studio, it seems only logical to add the implied tag to the series' tag.

Same could be said for Sly Cooper, but that's pretty second hand knowledge on my part.

EDIT: The tag implication ratchet_and_clank -> insomniac_games (forum #383755) has been rejected by @slyroon.

topic #27229

additional note for comparision and reference: pokemon does not imply gamefreak tag despite creating it and property legally belongs to nintendo. like crash bandicoot and spyro does not imply naughty dog and insomniac games respectively despite being creators, and instead activision because the property belongs to them.

snake-girl said:
additional note for comparision and reference: pokemon does not imply gamefreak tag despite creating it and property legally belongs to nintendo. like crash bandicoot and spyro does not imply naughty dog and insomniac games respectively despite being creators, and instead activision because the property belongs to them.

Then should Insomniac Games as a tag be deleted? Unless, of course, they hold their own internal IP that's separate from Sony.

The tag implication ratchet_and_clank -> insomniac_games (forum #383755) has been rejected by @slyroon.