The bulk update request #6057 is pending approval.
create implication black_bikini_bottom (317) -> black_bikini (2697)
create implication blue_bikini_bottom (161) -> blue_bikini (1341)
create implication brown_bikini_bottom (0) -> brown_bikini (45)
create implication green_bikini_bottom (119) -> green_bikini (903)
create implication grey_bikini_bottom (4) -> grey_bikini (46)
create implication orange_bikini_bottom (41) -> orange_bikini (263)
create implication pink_bikini_bottom (136) -> pink_bikini (1016)
create implication purple_bikini_bottom (123) -> purple_bikini (871)
create implication red_bikini_bottom (147) -> red_bikini (1462)
create implication tan_bikini_bottom (4) -> tan_bikini (15)
create implication teal_bikini_bottom (4) -> teal_bikini (34)
create implication white_bikini_bottom (93) -> white_bikini (853)
create implication yellow_bikini_bottom (76) -> yellow_bikini (814)
create implication rainbow_bikini_bottom (0) -> rainbow_bikini (31)
create implication translucent_bikini_bottom (5) -> translucent_bikini (123)
create implication multicolored_bikini_bottom (6) -> multicolored_bikini (169)
create implication multi_tone_bikini_bottom (0) -> multi_tone_bikini (0)
Reason: Extension of BUR #6055, exclusively dealing with "<color>_bikini_bottom -> <color>_bikini".
I hope it's obvious why these implications should exist.
I left out "monotone_bikini_bottom -> monotone_bikini" and "two_tone_bikini_bottom -> two_tone_bikini". Just because the bikini bottom only uses 1 or 2 colors doesn't mean that the entire bikini does!
Updated