The bulk update request #6057 is pending approval.
create implication black_bikini_bottom (275) -> black_bikini (2178)
create implication blue_bikini_bottom (148) -> blue_bikini (1127)
create implication brown_bikini_bottom (0) -> brown_bikini (40)
create implication green_bikini_bottom (137) -> green_bikini (742)
create implication grey_bikini_bottom (3) -> grey_bikini (42)
create implication orange_bikini_bottom (34) -> orange_bikini (199)
create implication pink_bikini_bottom (119) -> pink_bikini (863)
create implication purple_bikini_bottom (97) -> purple_bikini (703)
create implication red_bikini_bottom (134) -> red_bikini (1240)
create implication tan_bikini_bottom (4) -> tan_bikini (13)
create implication teal_bikini_bottom (2) -> teal_bikini (20)
create implication white_bikini_bottom (83) -> white_bikini (782)
create implication yellow_bikini_bottom (64) -> yellow_bikini (679)
create implication rainbow_bikini_bottom (0) -> rainbow_bikini (23)
create implication translucent_bikini_bottom (3) -> translucent_bikini (119)
create implication multicolored_bikini_bottom (5) -> multicolored_bikini (146)
create implication multi_tone_bikini_bottom (0) -> multi_tone_bikini (0)
Reason: Extension of BUR #6055, exclusively dealing with "<color>_bikini_bottom -> <color>_bikini".
I hope it's obvious why these implications should exist.
I left out "monotone_bikini_bottom -> monotone_bikini" and "two_tone_bikini_bottom -> two_tone_bikini". Just because the bikini bottom only uses 1 or 2 colors doesn't mean that the entire bikini does!
Updated