The bulk update request #6057 is pending approval.
create implication black_bikini_bottom (295) -> black_bikini (2448)
create implication blue_bikini_bottom (152) -> blue_bikini (1247)
create implication brown_bikini_bottom (0) -> brown_bikini (47)
create implication green_bikini_bottom (108) -> green_bikini (833)
create implication grey_bikini_bottom (4) -> grey_bikini (44)
create implication orange_bikini_bottom (38) -> orange_bikini (236)
create implication pink_bikini_bottom (131) -> pink_bikini (946)
create implication purple_bikini_bottom (116) -> purple_bikini (807)
create implication red_bikini_bottom (141) -> red_bikini (1347)
create implication tan_bikini_bottom (4) -> tan_bikini (15)
create implication teal_bikini_bottom (4) -> teal_bikini (32)
create implication white_bikini_bottom (89) -> white_bikini (795)
create implication yellow_bikini_bottom (69) -> yellow_bikini (749)
create implication rainbow_bikini_bottom (0) -> rainbow_bikini (29)
create implication translucent_bikini_bottom (3) -> translucent_bikini (119)
create implication multicolored_bikini_bottom (6) -> multicolored_bikini (156)
create implication multi_tone_bikini_bottom (0) -> multi_tone_bikini (0)
Reason: Extension of BUR #6055, exclusively dealing with "<color>_bikini_bottom -> <color>_bikini".
I hope it's obvious why these implications should exist.
I left out "monotone_bikini_bottom -> monotone_bikini" and "two_tone_bikini_bottom -> two_tone_bikini". Just because the bikini bottom only uses 1 or 2 colors doesn't mean that the entire bikini does!
Updated