The tag alias #65327 tv_dinner_art -> detailed_genitals has been rejected.

Reason: Extremely unintuitive name. I'm also okay with giving it a new name instead of aliasing it, but it can't stand as it is.

EDIT: The tag alias tv_dinner_art -> detailed_genitals (forum #385827) has been rejected by @Vulpes_Artifex.

this is a terrible tag name, but I feel like there might still be a reason to tag this phenomenon. maybe something like disproportionately_detailed_genitals.

...what

That is... such an awful tag name. I thought it was an artist name at first before reading the rest of the request.

I love how dumb the name, lol ^{yeah, we should probably rename it.}

someone established this tag from this post #1230836 that started all, but i share the same mind with everyone that the name is... bad lmao
it doesn't have to do anything with tv dinner but this single post of someone's impression. the name speaks like a copyrighted name of some kind of meme subject (e.g gris_swimsuit), but unlike the clothing meme, it really sounds counterintuitive. my same thoughts goes to scenery_porn.

and aliasing to detailed_genitals doesn't vibe either, partially_colored seem to be more ideal but it's preferably should be renamed something else to refer colored genitals only

sipothac said:
maybe something like disproportionately_detailed_genitals.

I like this name

The tag alias tv_dinner_art -> detailed_genitals (forum #385827) has been rejected by @Vulpes_Artifex.

The bulk update request #6176 has been rejected.

create alias tv_dinner_art (0) -> disproportionately_detailed_genitals (73)

Reason: Per discussion.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6176 (forum #385854) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

Speaking as someone who has half the wiki edits for that tag under his name, I agree that the name is awful, but it does describe something useful. disproportionately_detailed_genitals does a good job of expressing how this isn't just spot color (which a lot of tagged posts incorrectly use it for), but actual drawing detail and effort.

With that said, I have seen some examples of this done on a character's open mouth, which would probably need its own tag. Might need some manual retagging before this goes through.

post #2818265 post #2317013

vulpes_artifex said:
The bulk update request #6176 has been rejected.

create alias tv_dinner_art (0) -> disproportionately_detailed_genitals (73)

Reason: Per discussion.

I think this should be a mass update (after cleaning the mouths and stuff out) instead of an alias tbh. Edit: never mind it's probably fine

Then we could also have a disproportionately_detailed_mouth tag. Maybe an umbrella tag name could be like... just disproportionate_detail?

How about selective_detailing or selectively_detailed? A different tag for each part seems unnecessary.

oopsitripped said:
How about selective_detailing or selectively_detailed?

Good idea

The bulk update request #8664 is active.

create alias tv_dinner_art (0) -> selectively_detailed (72)
change category selectively_detailed (72) -> meta

Reason: I like selectively_detailed, genitals are not the only thing people do this for

I figure there's no harm in mouth and genitals subtags though, I could see vore enthusiasts for example wanting to search for specifically the mouth version of this. Putting those in a separate BUR though for separate voting/approval.

EDIT: The bulk update request #8664 (forum #409208) has been approved by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8665 is active.

create implication disproportionately_detailed_genitals (73) -> selectively_detailed (72)
create implication disproportionately_detailed_mouth (3) -> selectively_detailed (72)

Reason: the subtags

EDIT: The bulk update request #8665 (forum #409210) has been approved by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8664 (forum #409208) has been approved by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #6176 (forum #385854) has been rejected by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8665 (forum #409210) has been approved by @scaliespe.

Could probably do one for feet too

The bulk update request #8675 is active.

create implication disproportionately_detailed_feet (0) -> selectively_detailed (72)
create implication disproportionately_detailed_anus (2) -> selectively_detailed (72)

Reason: Feet and anus

EDIT: The bulk update request #8675 (forum #409310) has been approved by @scaliespe.

The bulk update request #8675 (forum #409310) has been approved by @scaliespe.