Let's say I'm uploading and tagging a sequence with a "gynomorph" character, but her breasts and face aren't visible in every individual image in the sequence. No other characters involved would be tagged "gynomorph," just the one who isn't always fully visible.

In that circumstance, should I still tag the posts for the images where her face and breasts aren't visible as "gynomorph"? Or would I tag each post agnostic of the contents of all other parts in the sequence?

jadebbutts said:
Or would I tag each post agnostic of the contents of all other parts in the sequence?

Yes. Though you could add gynomorph_(lore) in addition.

Please refer to the How To Tag Genders page and follow the flowchart.
Typically, a character's face isn't enough to justify tagging them as gynomorph as their genitals and breasts are more important indicators.

When tagging gender that isn't canonically theirs (e.g., male, female, ambiguous_gender, etc.), then you should include the respective lore-correct gender tag (i.e., gynomorph_(lore)).

i would just like to add that you check out post relationships in the help index where it asks to please not use parent/child tags for comics, those should be set as pools. parent/child posts would be more freely to change genders while pools would be more set on one per character through lore unless changed through transformation