The tag alias #67260 consensual_cuckold -> swingers has been rejected.

Reason:

I don't see why consensual_cuckold exists when you can just search "cuckold -humiliation", and then the "swingers" tag also exists.
The page for consensual_cuckold even actually says "Also known as 'swinging'"! But swingers is already a tag, so why do we have two tags that mean the same thing?
Either one of them needs to be deleted, or a description has to change because having multiple tags for essentially the same thing is just confusing for users

Sent in as a report, was advised to fill out this form.
Additionally, the swingers tag page says "rather than one or the other being left out" but this is just subjective. What counts as being "left out"? A lot of people seem to think a character watching two other characters have sex is "being left out", but you have no way of knowing that if there's no text/dialogue. It could just simply be two characters taking turns with a third character, which I wouldn't say counts as someone being "left out". Also in this case if there are three characters, the swingers tag still needs to be used as the couple depicted would be swingers. It does not require two couples, just one couple having consenting sex or sexual contact with at least one other character.
Overall, these tags are whishy-washy at best, something definitely needs to change.

EDIT: The tag alias consensual_cuckold -> swingers (forum #392948) has been rejected by @Cinder.

averyhyena said:
The tag alias #67260 consensual_cuckold -> swingers has been rejected.

Reason: Sent in as a report, was advised to fill out this form.
Additionally, the swingers tag page says "rather than one or the other being left out" but this is just subjective. What counts as being "left out"? A lot of people seem to think a character watching two other characters have sex is "being left out", but you have no way of knowing that if there's no text/dialogue. It could just simply be two characters taking turns with a third character, which I wouldn't say counts as someone being "left out". Also in this case if there are three characters, the swingers tag still needs to be used as the couple depicted would be swingers. It does not require two couples, just one couple having consenting sex or sexual contact with at least one other character.
Overall, these tags are whishy-washy at best, something definitely needs to change.

Uhm, doesn't swingers imply two couples? i.e. Partner swap?
I was thinking specifically of two definitions here :"a person who engages in the exchanging of spouses for sexual activities" "a person who swaps sexual partners in a group, esp habitually"

The tag alias consensual_cuckold -> swingers (forum #392948) has been rejected by @Cinder.