Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #56620 back_boob -> rear_view has been rejected.
Reason: Back_boob already implies we must see the character from behind
Better?
EDIT: The tag implication back_boob -> rear_view (forum #393689) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
at the same time, backsack doesn't imply the rear view. also something stops is whether couple of posts are really 'rear' or not.
back_boob can be three-quarter_view too, which would make the implication incorrect.
Then as mentioned above, there's the ambiguity of whether it's rear view or not.
The tag implication back_boob -> rear_view (forum #393689) has been rejected by @slyroon.
