Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: ghost -> undead

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The tag implication #56661 ghost -> undead has been rejected.

Reason: Definition from Oxford languages: "an apparition of a dead person which is believed to appear or become manifest to the living, typically as a nebulous image." I would say this counts for undead.

EDIT: The tag implication ghost -> undead (forum #393896) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

I think for tagging purposes it'd be better to keep spirits seperated from reanimated bodies.

sipothac said:
I think for tagging purposes it'd be better to keep spirits separated from reanimated bodies.

But the wiki page for undead also says that ghosts are undead: "When something is not dead, but not really living either. This includes zombies, ghouls, ghosts, and other things that roam about but don't exactly live." As well as this, spectre is linked to undead, and a spectre is a type of spirit. I am not advocating for spirit to be linked, but a ghost is commonly accepted as undead. I don't see any meaningful difference between a ghost and a spectre, so I don't see why one implies undead and the other doesn't

Updated

Watsit

Privileged

I think "ghost" is a bit more generic for "ethereal body", it doesn't have to strictly be an undead creature given how it can be used to describe certain pokemon and creatures like boo_(mario) that don't necessarily represent something deceased.

I would consider a ghost to be a non-physical manifestation of a dead individual (at least when it's not being used as some sort of ghost-like being that isn't necessarily dead, such as the ghosts from Pac-Man) while undead are basically physical remains that should be dead and inanimate but somehow aren't.

  • 1